Re: Thomas (was Davis & Johnston)
- My first thought was how a Grant or Sherman would have handled
Vicksburg as a Confederate commander - but then, I thought ...
How would George Thomas have done?
--- In email@example.com, "carlw4514" <carlw4514@y...>
> Joe, Beauregard would have been the right choice for the defense ofhad
> the area. And we most likely wouldnt then have gotten this
> unmanageable command situation that helped sink the Confederate
> It would have all been up to Beauregard, who just might have pulled
> off a long, stubborn defense.
> -but I think it was Dave S. who just pointed out that Beauregard
> just been sent packing; Jeff D. COULDN'T have had him on his shortwrote:
> PS: gee, I wonder how Hooker would do as defender of Vicksburg?
> [inside joke... sorry]
> [Joe, couldnt resist. Good chance you'll have the last laugh.]
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "hartshje" <Hartshje@a...>
> > Beauregard was an excellent engineer with a good eye for
> > strength, but his offensive ideas were just too grandiose. Hewas
> > desperate to stay in the limelight that he was constantly writing
> > long exposes to any general or politician he thought might listen
> > his strategies, which were usually far-fetched. He was tooarrogant
> > for his own political good. His defenses of Charleston andhave
> > Petersburg were excellent, and I truly wonder how well HE might
> > managed to do at Vicksburg instead of Pemberton.
> > Joe H.
- In a message dated 7/10/2003 8:51:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, slippymississippi@... writes:
> Is there any evidence that Sherman had beef with Logan? PoliticalFollowing Atlanta, Logan took leave to do some politicing in order for supporting Lincoln's election coming up in November. He had finished that and was on his way back when Grant sent him the wire to proceed to Nashville and take over command from Thomas. After that order was rescinded, Logan went back and joined Sherman. If Sherman had a beef with Logan so much and did not respect his ability, why did he have Logan appointed the final commander of the Army of the Tennessee. Granted, a year earlier, he had Howard replace McPherson rather than Logan, but not only was Howard a WP graduate, he outranked Logan. I do not think anything personal was involved in Sherman's decision making in this case.
> general or not, he was one of the most effective division commanders
> under Grant during the Vicksburg campaign. It's hard to
> Sherman would relish the loss of a good general.