Re: Jefferson Davis and Joe Johnston
- Can't find my source on this, Dave, but doubts about Pemberton
apparently started after Beauregard took over Charleston SC defenses;
Pemberton was in charge of them prior to B. and he, B., was pretty
critical of what P. had done to that point. I'm sure this criticism
circulated in the CSA and got to Davis.
-I hate it when I can't find a source. I'm thinking it was not
circulated in anything official like the OR's, though.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Dave Smith" <dmsmith001@y...>
> I've long suspected that one of the primary reasons Davis orderedcapable
> Johnston to Mississippi May 9, 1863 was an understanding on Davis's
> part that Pemberton had no military experience in the field at any
> level. Johnston was still viewed as probably the second most
> field general the Confederacy had.
> Does anyone know of any primary sources (or secondary, for that
> matter) that support this?
> Dave Smith
> Villa Hills, KY
- In a message dated 7/10/2003 8:51:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, slippymississippi@... writes:
> Is there any evidence that Sherman had beef with Logan? PoliticalFollowing Atlanta, Logan took leave to do some politicing in order for supporting Lincoln's election coming up in November. He had finished that and was on his way back when Grant sent him the wire to proceed to Nashville and take over command from Thomas. After that order was rescinded, Logan went back and joined Sherman. If Sherman had a beef with Logan so much and did not respect his ability, why did he have Logan appointed the final commander of the Army of the Tennessee. Granted, a year earlier, he had Howard replace McPherson rather than Logan, but not only was Howard a WP graduate, he outranked Logan. I do not think anything personal was involved in Sherman's decision making in this case.
> general or not, he was one of the most effective division commanders
> under Grant during the Vicksburg campaign. It's hard to
> Sherman would relish the loss of a good general.