Re: Lew Wallace's Destination
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "bjer50010" <bjewell@i...> wrote:
> ...As far as I recall, the arrangement with WHL Wallace was in order to
> > A separate question is whether Wallace should have known
> better at
> > the time.
> The answer is yes, he should have known it at the time. He and
> WHL Wallace had agreed to come to each other's aid. Since
> WHL's camps are close to the point at which Lew actually did
> arrive on the field, he should have known that was the closer
> route. In addition, the River Rd. bridge was repaired and the
> road partially cordouroyed in part by Lew Wallace's men. How
> could he not have known about the River Rd?
ensure reinforcements for Lew, not the other way around. So all Lew
needed to worry about was getting a message through and that WHL knew
where to find him. Also, this arrangement was being made on (IIRC)
the 4th, so it was a relatively new task. Could it have been done
better? Sure. I just don't take as critical view of Wallace as you.
Like the other commanders involved, Wallace was functioning under a
preconceived notion of how the campaign would unfold: they were on
the offense; the rebs were on defense. So he spent his time learning
the roads forward toward Purdy, instead of toward Pittsburg Landing.
- --- In email@example.com, GnrlJEJohnston@a... wrote:
> ...Lewis Cass (first governor ofHe was also a general in the war of 1812, Secretary of War under
> Michigan I believe)...
Jackson, Secretary of State under Buchanan [until he resigned during
the secession crisis] and the Democratic Party's Presidential
Candidate in 1848 (lost to Taylor), in addition to a bunch of other
sutff (amassador, congressman, senator)