Re: Confederate Attack Plan and Suicide Missions
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Will <wh_keene@y...>"
> --- In email@example.com, "bjer50010 <bjewell@i...>"that
> <bjewell@i...> wrote:
> > ...
> > Thanks for providing the cite. I vaguely recalled a message to
> > effect. It certainly seems that defense was a consideration, atthe
> > least early on. But ISTM that considering that Lick Creek was
> > considered impassable, except to cavalry (OR X Pt. II, 385) on
> > 2, that it may well have seemed an impenetrable barrier several
> > earlier. By April 5, however, the creek was supposedly shallow
> > enough to be readily forded by infantry. Similar considerations
> > probably applied to both Owl Creek and Snake Creek.
> The April 2 report by Chalmers only referred to the crossings of
> creek along the routes from Hamburg. Was it readily fordable byThat's what Daniel says, but he didn't provide a source, as far as I
> infantry in that area on the 5th?
can tell. But he also stated that the fact wasn't relevant, as ASJ
didn't know about it and it never really mattered as far as the plan
of attack was concerned. My only point in stating this is to show
how the terrain was altered with time, so Sherman's original
justification for choosing the site based on it's defensibility may
not have been relevant three weeks later.