Re: Thomas and Duplicity
- Yes the M.O. is instead of blaming Thomas,ALWAYS
pass the Blame off to Sherman,Grant,McPherson, or
Yossarain! The Baron
- In email@example.com, "josepharose <josepharose@y...>" <josepharose@y...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Aurelie1999@a... wrote:
> > In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:53:11 PM Central Standard Time,
> > dmsmith001@y... writes:
> > > I'm confused, Connie, how Thomas could know enough about Keim to
> > > finger him and recommend him for execution, but then afterwards
> > > plead "ignorance." Is it a semantics thing that I'm not
> > > understanding? :-)
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > I guess, but what do I know. I thought if a man is willing to
> pass judgment
> > and recommend the ultimate sentence, it is incumbent on him to
> know who and
> > why at the very minimum. I suppose some march to a different
> drummer and I
> > haven't been told the tune.
> > Connie
> Ms. Boone and Mr. Smith:
> Your criticism of Thomas is founded on Thomas' "ignorance" of Keim
> after he was able to "finger" Keim and then "recommend" execution.
> Thomas' statement that "I did not know anything about him" came
> exactly one day after identifying him. As he did not write, "I *do*
> not know anything about him," than it stands to reason that he was
> speaking about his knowledge at a past point in time--let's say two
> days before. Please read Thomas as he wrote; he didn't even make a
> poitive ID, merely stating that the article was "written, or
> pretended to be written" by Keim.
> Besides ignoring those facts, you make two, even more obvious
> mistakes. Thomas identified Keim through the article in the New
> York Herald. A lowly corporal serving in the Army of the Potomac
> could have "fingered" Keim in this respect just as well as Thomas
> did. In truth, *everyone* who read the article could have
> identified Keim!
> Secondly, if that corporal was even somewhat astute, he could also
> have recommended execution for a reporter who divulged what was
> obviously an important military secret. It doesn't take a very high
> IQ to recognize that.
> It's too bad that Sherman and McPherson didn't take "every
> precaution to prevent [the breaking of their code] being known to
> the rebels." I recommend that you take some of your high dudgeon
> for Thomas and transfer it to those two, instead.
- Mr. Weeks,
You recently mentioned not having an index to Sherman's memoirs,
IIRC, which makes me think that you or others might also not have a
digital copy of that work or of other useful books.
Would it be helpful, and would your website have the extra megabytes
(several MBs per book, roughly), for me to upload into your database
such texts as Sherman's, Grant's, and Sheridan's memoirs and Van
Horne's biography of Thomas? If so, once I return home, I would be
glad to do so.
I could put these in Word and/or .TXT formats.