Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: the RR question [was Shiloh paper ...]

Expand Messages
  • aot1952
    Well for what little it is worth, I am a card carrying member of Carl s Union Navy was the BIGGIE Club . I suppose by implication this means we are both
    Message 1 of 19 , Oct 27, 2002
      Well for what little it is worth, I am a 'card carrying' member of
      Carl's "Union Navy was the BIGGIE Club". I suppose by implication
      this means we are both members of the "Absence of a effective CS Navy
      was a BIGGIE Club."

      --- In civilwarwest@y..., "Will" <wh_keene@y...> wrote:
      > --- In civilwarwest@y..., "carlw4514" <carlw4514@y...> wrote:
      > > Re-reading this, I think I agree with your assertions. I
      > > concur that a bigger problem than the rickety railroads was the
      > Union
      > > navy. But I would not say that the South couldn't have used a
      > better
      > > railway system!
      > I think this is the real heart of the issue. The problem wasn't
      > whether the central government took control or the states took
      > control or private interestes kept control. The problem was that
      > railroad system was poor to begin with and wartime did not present
      > the opportunity for improvements.
      > An excellent example is the lack of continuous rail routes from
      > central MS to GA by way of AL. Look at the rail lines in central
      > Alabama on:
      > As a result, in the summer of 1862 when Bragg wanted to tranfer his
      > army from west to east he had move them from Tupelo to the end of
      > line in Mobile where they would be ferried across the bay to pick
      > the rail line to Atlanta. Likewise, in the spring of 1864 it took
      > longer to get Polk to move to Johnston than it would have if there
      > had been a continuous line.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.