Re: Grant vs. Johnston?
- --- In civilwarwest@y..., "wh_keene" <wh_keene@y...> wrote:
> I just don't know what my answer would be to this question.IMO, Grant would get there sooner, but because I would assume he'd
> But would love to hear the reasoning others have. Does anyone want
> to say why they picked Grant?
use the same "hit 'em, make 'em bleed, hit 'em again" strategy.
Johnston was so averse to fighting bloody battles that I believe he
would have taken his army completely out of the theatre of operations
after the second round. But that is just my opinion. Of course, if
that had happened, Hood might have gotten the assignment that much
sooner. Then what?