Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8586Re: Understanding Vicksburg

Expand Messages
  • carlw4514@yahoo.com
    Nov 24, 2001
      Dave, you are "the man" when it comes to Vicksburg and you have proved
      it again; you get the lion's share of credit for getting me so
      interested in Vicksburg. You are undoubtedly correct that a stymied
      Grant could have fallen back and functioned at Grand Gulf, not that
      there was any real doubt in Grant's mind that he was going to pull
      this thing off.
      I wonder what sort of situation the Federals would have had, had
      they moved back to Grand Gulf. Would it have been similar to
      Chattanooga before the "cracker line" was opened? I have to assume
      that 1) Porter's warning had some meaning 2) the famous 7 attempts to
      crack the Vicksburg nut outlined by Foote and others showed that the
      situation of having "some" kind of supply situation through the
      Louisiana side was not considered the answer; Grant's last move before
      this one was to try another failed canal (IIRC). There must have been
      a reason to try these canals etc. Am I all wet?
      --- In civilwarwest@y..., "Dave Smith" <dmsmith001@y...> wrote:

      > This is an interesting point. Grant was indeed "living off the
      > land," to a fairly large degree. But he wasn't living that way,
      > exclusively; he had cut and curderoyed (sp?) roads through Louisiana
      > in order to facilitate the movement of supplies down the western
      > of the Mississippi. Those transport vessels were unloading at Grand
      > Gulf while the campaign was unfolding.
      > It was a slow, laborious process - but it was a process.
      > When Pemberton attempted his ill-fated move to Dillon's Plantation
      > attack Blair's division, it was to attempt to cut that very supply
      > line. Not that it would have mattered much, because it wasn't a
      > supply line in the more traditional sense . . . [...] But I think
      Grant was closer to having to move
      > back towards his base at Grand Gulf, or hastily attack Pemberton,
      > then we often think, given the known results.
    • Show all 28 messages in this topic