46894Re: [civilwarwest] Retreat and Fall Back
- Dec 24, 2010you seem to ignore the fact that they perserved. What they did worked.
You can parse it all you like.
But it worked. Unless you are falling on the old canards that they were lucky or the enemy stupid.
It worked and they were brilliant in the execution.
I might read the other posts. But it is Christmas. Family and church beckon.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerryFrom: keeno2@...Sender: firstname.lastname@example.orgDate: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:01:53 -0500 (EST)To: <email@example.com>ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.orgSubject: Re: [civilwarwest] Retreat and Fall BackSee other responses. Living off the countryside yields neither ammo nor tack. Food, yes. Ammo and tack, no. Let's also remember that the food gathered requires butchering, grinding, baking, et al. Not particularly conducive to an army trying to get somewhere in a hurry.When Sherman marched through Georgia, he alternated which divisions led -- the lead division got the forage. There was little left for those following. And Sherman brought with him a potful of wagons with ammo and spare tack. Grant did the same with his Bruinsburg supply line.
From: jlawrence <jlawrence@...>
To: civilwarwest <email@example.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 1:54 pm
Subject: Re: [civilwarwest] Retreat and Fall Back
. True, Holly Springs was a successful confederate stroke but it did nothing but delay Grants continued advances on Vicksburg. It did not change Grant's objective, only how he got there. Grant did not retreat from Holly Springs but, yes he did change his base of supply and axis of advance. Hello. I am not sure Grant ever retreated. The Holly Springs thing was one of what, six failed attempts to seize Vicksburg? With his supply line cut and the railroads being torn up, he just retrenched and looked for another way in. What is always overlooked is what Grant learned-that body of troops, cut off in hostile territorty but previously unravaged by war, can support a march or maneuver by foraging the enemy for provender. And he did it. And he learned. The next year, in fear Napoleonic in execution of not in scope, using a grand calvary raid as a diversion, he conducted a successful river crossing below the city. He cut himself off and, using the foraging tactic learned the year before, he drove into the state ma took the capital This time it was Grant tearing up railroads and burning enemy assets. Securing his rear, he marched/fought his way back to Vicksburg, eventually securing it's fall. The winter next, Grant, Sherman and Lincoln devised a plan that, using the same tactic, would gut the south in the east. retreat hell Regards, Jack Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/civilwarwest/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/civilwarwest/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: firstname.lastname@example.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>