Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

45133Re: [civilwarwest] Re: The viability of Attack in the West versus the East

Expand Messages
  • Ricky Washburn
    Dec 31, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
       was the eventual fight at iuka irrelavent?

       
      <em><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR:#c00000;" face="Comic Sans MS" size="4"><font face="comic sans ms"></font></font></em>&nbsp;


      ----- Original Message ----
      From: "keeno2@..." <keeno2@...>
      To: civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2008 2:41:23 AM
      Subject: Re: [civilwarwest] Re: The viability of Attack in the West versus the East

      In a message dated 12/31/2007 4:41:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, raymond-ohara@ hotmail.com writes:
      can you find any reputable history that claims they defended anywhere north of jackson/vicksburg after shiloh?
      So we are reduced to discussing the number of angels that can dance on a pinhead? Beau stopped for six weeks on his way to Jackson, what else is new? Or important?
       
      ken
       
       






      Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
    • Show all 109 messages in this topic