Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

35639Why Trans-Miss. ?

Expand Messages
  • Norm Mikalac
    Nov 1 5:20 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      I don't understand why the Union spent a lot of military resources
      fighting in the trans-mississippi region. Once it had gained control
      of the Miss. R. and cut off supplies and men from that area, why not
      focus on driving the CSA forces towards to east to end the war sooner?
      Then the trans. Miss. CSA would have had to surrender.

      Any thoughts on these ideas?

    • Show all 16 messages in this topic