33846RE: [civilwarwest] Re: Logistics
- Sep 6, 2005So?
Kind of nit picky to me but what I have come to expect regarding any ANY
comment on or about Grant.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
On Behalf Of josepharose
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:17 PM
Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: Logistics
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, keeno2@a... wrote:
> Thanks, Mark, for the heads-up on Moore's article.
> Given Grant's distaste for mathematics, I suspect he simply kept on
> people who could reliably do those calculations for him. His
> "talent" was likely in intuitively knowing what could work and what
As to Grant's mathematical/logistical skills, IIRC, he once ordered
that a certain number of wagons carry a specified amount of
ammunition. He had to be told that the weight of the ammo which he
requested was much too much for each wagonload, and that the number of
wagons would consequently have to be increased.
> Of course, when planning a move, he was not exactly starting from
> Where his armies were parked at any given moment were gathering
> supplies. To move any part of his army would be to move
transportation to that part
> involved. To move all of his army would involve the gathering of extra
> wagons, horses, et al.
> As Moore pointed out, the speed of the march and the front it covered
> dictated the availability of foraged sustenance. The factors boggle.
Bring in that
> genius Colonel. Tell him we're moving yesterday and I want the
wherewithal to be
> ready the day before that.
> Thanks again.
Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>