23423Re: [civilwarwest] Re: Longstreet, the AoT, Bragg & Davis
- Oct 10, 2003There is a good essay on this by Edward Carr Franks in the book "Leadership and Command in the American Civil War." It discusses Bragg's options at Chattanooga, why Carter Stevenson and his division were first sent up to Knoxville, and why Longstreet was selected to replace him.----- Original Message -----From: james2044Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:56 PMSubject: [civilwarwest] Re: Longstreet, the AoT, Bragg & Davis
> Just for the record on this, the idea to send Longstreet to get
> Davis' and Lee's. Lee wanted Longstreet back, and Davis was
> accommodate him.
I can't find a reference for this but my understanding is this:
1) Lee didn't want Longstreet sitting on his duff. Horn uses the
term "barren victories" as something Lee was warning against.
2) Davis wanted a blow struck. He had a childish faith that w/o
resources battlefield victory could be attained.
3) Bragg was having real problems in Chattanooga and Longstreet
wasn't silent about them.
4) Everyone seems to have had an intrest in Burnside about this time.
IMO, Bragg knowing he couldn't get rid of Longstreet, needing to
keep Davis happy and wanting to remove the most logical replacement
for him, it's a no brainer.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>