Re: Fwd: Sandy Hook Massacre: Trying to Distinguish Legitimate Facts of the Staged Killings From Internet Hoaxers Confusing Our Perceptions (Dec. 22, 2012)
- Ed's softballs about Beau Bridges being Alex Jones, and Nelson Mandela
portraying Morgan Freeman, help to bury what seems to be the truth that
those two documentable professional actors in Florida had a job in
Connecticut, and the Emily Parker thing.
I guess that even a failure-based economy can move beyond fuzzy bin
Laden and bloodless beheadings if given enough time and trillions of
dollars of loot, if only by random iteration through artistic and
--- In email@example.com, "andy_tyme" wrote:
> Connections to consider:
> Chiarini boasts that he once worked as a close associate of Robert
Groden, back when Groden was busy publishing (through mainstream
presses, let's remember) his string of commercially successful
> Groden was later denounced as a disinformationalist by his onetime
writing partner Harrison Livingstone.
> And to this day, Groden insists that the (publicly circulating)
Zapruder Film is an absolutely genuine cinematic record of the Dallas
killing, despite the massive evidence that has been assembled by rival
photo experts proving that the (widely available) film is a crude (in
the digital era, but sophisticated by 1960s standards) forensic forgery,
with several crucial frames composited, time-shifted and airbrushed to
obfuscate key visual details of the assassination.
> Add to this the puerile, snide and disruptive manner in which Chiarini
has inserted himself into serious web discussions of proven fakery
elements in the official 9/11 narrative, and it seems plausible that Mr.
Ed is performing precisely the "cognitive infiltration" activities
infamously called for by Obama's "information czar," Dr. Cass Sunstein.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Robert" muckblit@ wrote:
> > Ed Chiarini also says Beau Bridges is Alex Jones, and Nelson Mandela
> > Morgan Freeman.
> > In so doing, Ed displays a degree of irrational compulsion far
> > surpassing any appearance of rational faculty there.
> > What if, in addition to a new diversionary path for us, Ed and the
> > are covering for real actors? What about that actor couple at Sandy
> > Hook? I thought he had them.
> > -Bob
> > --- In email@example.com, RoadsEnd wrote:
> > Begin forwarded message:
> > From: "Sardar"
> > Subject: Sandy Hook Massacre: Trying to Distinguish Legitimate
> > the Staged Killings From Internet Hoaxers Confusing Our Perceptions
> > (Dec. 22, 2012)
> > Date: May 1, 2013 6:35:40 PM PDT
> > To: "Sardar"
> > Sandy Hook Massacre: Trying to Distinguish Legitimate Facts of the
> > Staged Shooting From Internet Hoaxers Confusing Our Perceptions
> > From Ken Adachi, Editor
> > http://educate-yourself.org/cn/sandyhookinternethoaxers22dec12.shtml
> > December 22, 2012
> > Sandy Hook Massacre: Trying to Distinguish Legitimate Facts of the
> > Staged Killings From Internet Hoaxers Confusing Our Perceptions
> > 22, 2012)
> > There are so many irregularities about the individuals involved in
> > Sandy Hook shooting and their behavior that we can't be certain of
> > anything at this point and we shouldn't assume anything to be true
> > untrue just because it seems too outlandish to consider. However,
> > allegations seen on Youtube and on some web sites, don't bear up
> > scrutiny.
> > That being said, I am firmly convinced that Sandy Hook was a staged
> > shooting and that there is a cover-up in play which surely must
> > the police and other 'official' participants; both those named and
> > unnamed.
> > I studied the photos which I first noticed posted to Henry Makow's
> > site alleging to show photos of a possibly 'deceased' Emilie Parker
> > sitting on Obama's lap when he visited Newtown, Connecticut, and
> > allegation that Robbie Parker, the father, is an actor. At first
> > I thought that the Emilie Parker claim might be legit, but the more
> > studied the photo, the more my skepticism grew. The youngest Parker
> > child looks older in the photo taken with Obama, so naturally, the
> > second oldest daughter has grown a year or two since the family
> > portrait used for comparison. It doesn't strike me as odd that the
> > mother would use the same dress for the second child that was used
> > Emilie for the family portrait. Assuming that the mother and father
> > legit, it's common for mothers to use the same clothing for
> > who are close in age to each other, especially if she's looking for
> > best dress available for a photo with the Usurper President.
> > I watched a number of Youtube videos on different aspects of the
> > Hook massacre, and I found many comments link to Ed Chiarini's web
> > site, wellaware1.com , or they point to Jim
> > Stone's web site, jimstonefreelance.com ,
> > who mirrors the same story that Ed is making: e.g., no one died at
> > Sandy Hook and that the parents and others seen on TV are all
> > including the Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner, Dr H. Wayne Carver
> > I went to wellaware1.com and I have to say
> > that many of Ed's photo comparison are impressive and initially
> > to be on the money, but look closer and think about what Ed is
> > -- then investigate on your own -- and you'll discover piles, and
> > piles, and piles of 100% genuine horse manure fertilizer spread all
> > over Ed Chiarini's web site.
> > Ed Chiarini is simply reckless and wildly irresponsible in his
> > allegations, and you can't trust anything he says or alleges (Ed's
> > bizarre allegation that Father Charles Couglin of 1930's radio
> > broadcast fame, Walt Disney, Kermit Roosevelt, and Adolf Hitler are
> > the same person is absurdity on steroids. Other psychopathic
> > claims by Ed Chiarini include: Bing Crosby, Maurice Strong, and
> > Eichmann are the same person: Paul Newman and King Juan Carlos of
> > are the same person; Governor Jerry Brown and Noam Chomsky are the
> > person. I could go on, but you get the idea).
> > Ed, however, does have a knack for finding photos of different
> > who, in fact, look very similar to each other (which creates
> > in my mind that Ed Chiarini may be a set up, just like I believe
> > Stone" is a set up. The fact that Ed used to work for Robert J.
> > identified by Bill Cooper as an inner government disinformation
> > artist of JFK assassination photos, throws up a huge red flag for
> > Ed claims that Robbie Parker (and wife) is actually a professional
> > skateboarder seen on FaceBook named Tony Hawk (wife, Lhotse). But
> > at the photos and videos of Robbie Parker carefully and you can see
> > that he appears to be a younger man than Tony Hawk. Tony Hawk has
> > circles and slightly puffy bags under his eyes and Robbie does not.
> > Upon initial examination, there is a superficial, and perhaps
> > resemblance between Robbie Parker and Tony Hawk. However, look
> > and you will see that Ed is choosing photos which accentuate the
> > similarity in their respective appearance. The same precaution goes
> > the respective wives and the little girl of Tony Hawk.
> > there is a resemblance, but look close and hard and you will see
> > are not the same people.
> > Ed claims that the Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. H. Wayne
> > Carver II, has also portrayed himself as a wrestler named
> > Alan "Chris" Pallies, and a mafia hit man who died in prison in
> > named Richard Kuklinski (born 1935). The two photos of Chris
> > look very similar to a young H. Wayne Carver and I was taken aback
> > the similarity of appearance, but the 1940's era police mug shot
> > of Kuklinski (and other photos) used by Chiarini are less
> > The fact that Kuklinski was sentenced to five life prison terms in
> > and died in prison in 2006 should also tell you that he can't
> > be the 56 year old Dr. H. Wayne Carver whose official web site says
> > he's been on the job since 1983 and became chief medical examiner
> > 1989.
> > I raise these objections because I believe people like Ed Chiarini
> > Jim Stone are intentionally muddying the waters with exaggerated,
> > extreme, or untenable claims in order to further obfuscate and
> > an accurate perception of what's taking place at these staged
> > shooting/psyop events, and thus leave the public with so many
> > choices of what might have taken, that the public arrives at no
> > conviction of what happened and remain indecisive and uncertain of
> > course of action to pursue.
> > Ken Adachi
> > ------
> > © Copyright 2012 Educate-Yourself.org
> > All Rights Reserved
> > > > >