Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Dutch & US bicycling

Expand Messages
  • Jim Baross, Jr.
    I spent six days bicycling, walking and using public transit in Amsterdam and one day in Antwerp during my stay to attend VeloMondial 2000. Several comments:
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 30, 2000
      I spent six days bicycling, walking and using public transit in Amsterdam
      and one day in Antwerp during my stay to attend VeloMondial 2000.

      Several comments:
      1) There are MANY more people using bicycles (35% of daily trips!?) for
      everyday transportation and recreation than in San Diego. Bicyclists I
      noticed were almost exclusively adults but of every adult age and economic

      2) I saw no one wearing a helmet who didn't appear to be a tourist (In
      seven days I saw three people with helmets who were not part of Velo
      Mondial. I saw thousands of bicyclists.)

      3) Also, no one seemed to be wearing special clothing for bicycling. I saw
      only normal street clothes, business attire, dates side-saddle on bike's
      rear racks, short and long skirts, even formal evening wear... maybe folks
      had bike shorts on underneath?

      4) Amsterdam is a very compact city with very difficult conditions for
      using a car - lack of parking, narrow roadways/lanes, tram-train-bus
      facilities taking up space, narrow spaces between buildings, relatively
      high fuel costs, and maybe most importantly, ...

      5) Motorists showed a great deference to bicyclists! Somehow the behavior
      towards bicyclists, especially at those seemingly silly intersections where
      straight-through bicyclists are directed to the right of right turning
      cars... motorists yielded. General consensus among those to whom I spoke
      about this was that motorists either are also bicyclists or have family
      members/friends who are bicyclists. The "critical mass" for acceptance had
      apparently been passed. More on this later.

      6) Pedestrians also seemed to defer to bicyclists. This was clearly the
      case on the "bicycle tracks" (side paths) but also on shared sidewalks, at
      intersections and otherwise unmarked roadways.

      7) During one morning's count I saw that more than 75% of bicycles being
      used had chain guards and fenders. The style and equipment of bicycles
      seemed to be dictated by the desired use - everyday commutes, rather than
      the clothing being chosen by the requirements of the sporty machines
      (predominant in the US).

      8) It appeared to be expected that bicyclists would take any
      advantage/opportunity to keep rolling - through stop signs, red signals,
      etc. I didn't see anyone do this to block another persons right of way, but
      if there was a space to cross bicyclists would... strangely it seemed that
      pedestrians were not as likely to do this. My coming to a complete stop at
      red lights surprised several overtaking bicyclists... "when in Rome, ...".

      9) The only time I was honked at was when doing a vehicular left turn at an
      intersection that only provided for a side path/sidewalk style left turn. I
      believe that I was acting illegally for Amsterdam... mandatory side-path

      10) On roadways with a bike lane stripe there never seemed to be space
      enough to ride within the marked area and to stay out of the Door Zone.
      Parking turnover seemed to be very slow - few car doors were likely to
      open, but locals I asked said they had experienced being doored.

      11) Usually the available lane space left of the bike lane stripe,
      (reserved?) for motorists, was very narrow (>10' ?). On these facilities I
      observed the normal behavior to be that motorists would pass bicyclists
      very closely w/o causing the bicyclists to waver/change course at all. The
      close passing was disconcerting to me at first until I noticed even "little
      old ladies" bicycling seemingly w/o concern in these situations.... "when
      in Rome, ...".

      12) The traffic environment met my needs - I was on vacation. I had no real
      time constraints to reach any destination. I wasn't interested in speed...
      just cruising around gawking. I was however not content to be segregated
      from the rest of the roadway.

      13) The advance stop lines and the traffic signals sequenced to give peds
      and bicyclists the opportunity to start first certainly seemed to preclude
      the right/left turning motorist "error" of cutting off the non-motorized.
      Coupling these with having most bicyclists roll through a red light anyway
      made intersections appear pretty chaotic at first. But,

      14) Speeds were slow enough and most road users seemed adept at the close
      encounters - able and willing to non-verbally negotiate many encounters
      from every direction.

      15) Adults with children that were too young to bicycle, usually carried
      them in a child seat mounted between the handlebars and the bicyclist.
      These often had a windscreen for the child. Slightly older kids were
      astride the beefy rear racks. I saw several groups on there way to school
      with children on front and back. One woman I saw was riding like this while
      holding the back of the neck of her other child who appeared to be leaning
      to bicycle to school on her own... none with helmets of course.

      16) The coaster brake bike and the congested riding experience led me to
      set my rental bike's seat an inch or more lower than optimal for pedaling
      efficiency. I did this to help me stop the bike with the pedals in position
      to easily re-start.

      17) I participated in the Velo Mondial 2000 conference session titled
      "Integration or Segregation". The segregationist were firmly in control of
      the discussion via the moderator. I thought of the term "Uncle Tom", used
      in the US to refer to someone willing to put up with racial
      segregation/degradation because it is easier than trying for equality.

      I think that the Amsterdam system provides a desirable for some, but
      ultimately second class bicycling environment because it removes the choice
      to use the roadways when it is desirable and reasonable to do so. Even
      though many routes are exclusively for bicycling, even though bicycling is
      allowed (tolerated?) in two directions where motoring is one-way, even
      though they have spent lots of resources on special facilities, even though
      there certainly are lots of people bicycling, and even though motorists
      have learned to give way to bicyclists, I'd say the Amsterdam system of
      segregation should be used as an interim step toward integration with
      primacy of bicyclists and pedestrians on public roadways/rights of way...
      emergency vehicles excepted.

      I believe that the goal/issue is one of behavior change, not as primarily a
      facility issue.

      For safety and efficiency we need to have shared understandings/common
      behaviors that accommodate all legitimate road users. The steps toward
      those desired behaviors may include special facilities when appropriate,
      lots of education, appropriate enforcement, etc.

      The Amsterdam system of lanes for cars, bicycle "tracks" and sidewalks
      wouldn't work if established today in the US. We'd be mowed down by
      motorists at every intersection.
      Conversely, imposing on Amsterdam the US system of lanes for everyone (if
      you're willing to assert your rights) and sometimes some other special
      facilities for bicyclists would, I expect, result in many deaths in the
      first week.

      We need a transition plan.

      Jim B
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.