Re: Deconvolution quesiton
- Stan wrote:
"So a normal FWHM is probably just under 3" for that scope. (right?)
In that case, your avg sampling is near FWHM = 2.5 pix, which is undersampled, though not dramatically so"
You are correct. I'm lucky if I can get an FWHM under 3"--my seeing usually is not even quite that good. We have a marine layer that comes in many evenings that crappifies viewing. But it's the deck of cards I am dealt, so I play.