Re: PacMan from trip to New Mexico
- Thank you to both Stan and Bernard for your feedback.
Stan - could you explain your comment a little more to me? Are you speaking to the image scale or just the fact the images don't display properly?
My system is producing an imaging scale of 2.69 arcsec/pix, which is works well for me in my light polluted back yard. I could probably have removed the FR for this object in addition to the support of great NM sky conditions.
I didn't realize Zenfolio wasn't producing the largest image size. I had to uncheck a setting restriction to do so. I now have a larger image to view here: http://astromarina.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v75/p1410219766.jpg
I look forward to your additional comments.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Stan" wrote:
> Hi Barry,
> NM is a great place!
> My only complaint is that the "high res" display images are too small and undersampled.
- --- "barry.schellenberg" wrote:
> Stan ... Are you speaking to the image scale...Right. The display image was too small. The new one is well sampled
> I didn't realize Zenfolio wasn't producing the largest image size.
> http://astromarina.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v75/p1410219766.jpgI am not fond of "black" backgrounds, mostly because they hide the faint fuzzies but also because it is harsh on the eye and looks unatural. A black background is often employed to bury poor flatting or other problems, so unless you have such problems then try showing the dim data.
> I look forward to your additional comments.