74059Re: [ccd-newastro] Light Pollution filter as luminance?
- Apr 20, 2014You’re dealing with fundamental physics here. Signal and noise.Combining red, green, and blue images is going to be nearly the same as using a luminance filter - you will have about the same spectrum coming through either way. I don’t think there’s anything to be gained that way.If you want to use a light pollution filter, then success depends on whether or not it filters out the specific wavelengths that are a problem for you. On the one hand, you could attempt to study the wavelengths, but that’s a sophisticated effort. You can also buy one and try it, or borrow on from a friend.It’s tough to get good results from a light polluted area. You needs a LOT of signal to be able to clean up the unwanted signal. There’s no tricks or secrets. It just takes a lot of time on sky and developing the skills to get rid of that unwanted signal.
Ron WodaskiOn Apr 20, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Mark Striebeck <mark.striebeck@...> wrote:
Hi,Now, where galaxy season is upon us, I have to put my narrowband filters aside for a little and try to improve my RGB imaging skills. I am imaging from near downtown San Jose, CA. Light pollution is pretty bad!My main struggle is with luminance - using a luminance filter is useless under these conditions.I tried to do RGB imaging only (all binned 1x1). With that, I get relatively good object data, but it's hard to get out details and to reduce background noise.I am trying right now to create a synthetic luminance image and use that - but so far with mixed results.I also took some Ha subs to be used as a luminace layer (and to boost the red signal) but their SNR is still pretty bad (low background noise, but also low signal).I wonder if it would be possible to use a light pollution filter to take a luminance image?Or any other methods that people use?MarkS
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>