Re: Joy Shattering Plank Cities in Venice
- It seems my lengthy reply to your previous posting has been lost
through the ether, but anyway, the gist of my reply then was that we
mustn't lose our sense of scale.
A city of boxes, towers and expansive empty public squares was okay
for the 50s and 60s, but it's abit inorganic, tired and monstrous.
Cities of the mind can be perfect, efficient and manageable in every
sense, but the real construct needs to be useable and liveable.
I would hate to live in a high-density legoland.
I just don't think you should throw the proverbial baby out with the
I'm only 5 years older than you in your age description.
What a difference you will find a year makes in dealing with town
planning and urban design issues!
Wouldn't it make more sense to tackle the issues at ground level?
(excuse my punning)
Come to Sydney to witness the development paradigm here. Perhaps you
won't feel California's urban areas are the most autocentric and
shockingly planned places in the world after all.
Keep the discussion going!