RE: [carfree_cities] Taurus vs civic gets the boot
- I think it could be said that Phoenix is extremely car-centric...
suburban sprawl (Phoenix is now the 7th most populous city in the USA)...
completely designed around the auto and the freeway.
But there are some redeeming feautures.
First there are extensive bikepaths that parallel the 1000 year old canal
(Thank-you Hohokam Indians!)
Secondly, Phoenix is modeled after the desert: endless repetitions of the
pattern: the same fast-food joints, discount stores, Starbucks coffee shops,
groceries stores every 10 miles or so....
This means that as the car-based system breaks down, or individuals choose
carfree, they have good facilities within easy reach....
The suburban sprawl can be made to break down into an endless array of local
Hope for the future...
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Ian Fiddies
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:59 AM
Subject: [carfree_cities] Taurus vs civic gets the boot
Let's assume that someone must have a car for some reason. Maybe someone
just lives in
> an auto-centric city, or maybe someone lives in a (real) small town orSince I live near downtown only 8 km out, even though I live in an
> rural area.
> I have a 1993 Ford Taurus (gift; I did not pick it). I've seen it get as
> low as 12 miles per
> gallon, since I live near downtown and have to slog through a lot of
> stop-and-go no
auto-centric city I don't drive! I don't even let someone give me a lift
unless they're going in my direction. I've got a really good pair of ex-army
boots and my footprint I quiet large, size 14. Because I don't walk much,
slightly less than 5000km a year I feel it would be unnecessary to buy
purchase new boots every year and get by with a rehealing once a year. Of
course walking is for peasants and only an idiot like me would use it as a
means of transport in a modern town.
I do own a couple of bikes and live within a mile of a bus that runs once an
hour so if I'm in a hurry due to bad planning I can ride. Problem with
refusing to drive a nasty smelly death machine because they're destroying
our planet and mutilating our social interactivity etc. is that it makes you
really hate cars and the idiots that drive them. They don't half spoil the
joys of pedestrian mobility.
Freedom of movement is one of the UN's human rights. I think that even
includes carfree types like some of us. Since everyone lives in a
municipally governed area, it must be reasonable to demand some kind of
transport infrastructure to facilitate movement. The argument loses a great
deal of power it the arguer has a car blocking up their drive.
Yahoo! Groups Links