Re: Tokyo concept
- Sure, there are problems with transport in Japan, but to one currently
living in Minneapolis, where the governor has just vetoed legislation
that would have prevented fare hikes and service cuts to transit in the
Twin Cities, not that the transit system was anything to brag about in
the first place.
I easily lived carfree in Tokyo, somewhat less so in Portland, Oregon.
I find it impossible to be any more than "car lite" in Minneapolis.
By the way, I always found transfers in Tokyo and Yokohama easy, thanks
to the SF Metro card, the debit card facilitates transfers among the
various private subway and surface train lines and is usable as far
afield as the Tobu Line to Nikko or the Seibu line to Chichibu.
On Jun 25, 2005, at 1:37 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> The urban rail corridors too can lack customer utility when a person
> wants to
> travel on multiple corridors. In Tokyo, for example, there are two
> subway companies. To transfer from one to another you must
> essentially pay
> twice. Likewise, you pay again when transferring to the monorail or
> the new
> rail transit service across the Rainbow Bridge. The same is true in
> where the subway, monorail, and the various other urban rail systems
> are all
> separate companies. Further, transfers between systems can be quite
> difficult, as known to anyone who has negotiated Tokyo station or Umeda
> station will know.