Re: [carfree_cities] Re: "America's Epidemic of Youth Obesity"--NYT article
- Actually, the pump price would have to be $10-15 per gallon higher
to recoup all the externalized costs. That's not a misprint. Gas
would cost about ten times as much as it does now (USA). This
figure is from the US Office of Technology Assessment.
People simply aren't aware of the staggering costs associated
with heavy car use.
>It's not just income taxes that subsidize automobiles, it is also property-- ### --
>and sales taxes. If the automobile in North America were to pay for itself
>at the pump, the motor fuels tax would be two to three dollars higher.
>Instead, to promote the use of the private automobile during the twentieth
>century, government at all levels opted instead to pay for autos and trucks
>through general funds. Tinkering on a large scale through successful
>highway lobbying bankrupted mass transit systems, most of which were
>privately owned, and put what was left of them on the public dole also.
>This disruption of the free market in transportation by highway socialism in
>the USA has put us in the position of having the most costly transportation
>system in the world. It also explains to a large extent why 5% of the
>world's people account for 25% of world energy use.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "paulparma" <info@...>
>Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:33 PM
>Subject: [carfree_cities] Re: "America's Epidemic of Youth Obesity"--NYT
>> --- In carfree_cities@y..., "Matt Hohmeister" <mdh6214@g...> wrote:
>> > If our governments stopped subsidizing transportation, car use would
>> > be much less popular, due to its much higher cost, since not all
>> > taxpayers would be forced to pay for the activities of some.
>> Would like the group, OK maybe just myself if I'm the only one that
>> doesn't get it, to get in sync on this.
>> Exactly what are the amounts and items subsidized. Acording to the
>> Department of Xportation, most federal Highway money comes from gas
>> taxes, the rest, a much lesser amount, coming from income taxes.
>> I have been led to think that a business can write off the money lost
>> in offering free parking to its employees (customers as well?). This
>> would be a lot if the diference is based on what could have been built
>> in lieu of a parking lot (a side; denser building means higher
>> property values; I would be living in Venice, New York or San
>> fransico now otherwise).
>> So what else SPECIFICALLY is there? No pollution costs, etc. please.
>> I can't use that at a party, even in Austin. The biggest cost I see
>> isn't hidden, but is still sizable -- the direct and upkeep cost of
>> car ownership $5K-$6.5K for most, a lot less to me and mine.
>> Thanks in advance.
>> To Post a message, send it to: carfree_cities@...
>> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
>> Group address: http://www.egroups.com/group/carfree_cities/
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>To Post a message, send it to: carfree_cities@...
>To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: carfree_cities-unsubscribe@...
>Group address: http://www.egroups.com/group/carfree_cities/
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
J.H. Crawford Carfree Cities
- --- In email@example.com, "J.H. Crawford" <mailbox@c...>
> I see a window of opportunity here. The next year or two are goingShould we be targeting the transportation departments as well as ,
> to be years of budget crises in the USA, especially at the state
> level. ....................
> Are we ready? Can we organize to take adantage of this opportunity?
> Can we start a massive program of writing to legislators and news
> media? Can anyone take responsibilty for coming up with the best
> numbers we've got and working them into some generalized press
> releases? Can others tailor these for local environments and get
> them into the right hands? Lots of work, but some real chance of
> a payback.
maybe even preceding lobbying the legislators? These guys are are the
ones under presure; there's all that federal money, waiting to be
matched, because we are still driving and paying those federal gas tax
dollars, so the federal pile keeps getting bigger, and unused. Won't
the state folks know that as the DIRECT gas taxes go up, the gas usage
goes down. Which I think, if this is in fact so, can be properly
countered with, sure, now you'll have all the money you need to do
what ever people want to pay for.... so trtansit, and most central,
dense building and rebuilding, wil get a fare shake.
To me this is the thing we have to discuss, besides the numbers, and
were it comes from now stuff; that is we need to diccuss what we think
the very astute sense of the xportation administrators to know that if
they raise the gas taxes, revinue, especially in a recovered economy
will be down from what it could be in the current methodology. I
think that the game has in fact changed in that toll roads are now
the previlent building mode.... discussion by more informed