Re: "America's Epidemic of Youth Obesity"--NYT article
- --- In carfree_cities@y..., "Matt Hohmeister" <mdh6214@g...> wrote:
> If our governments stopped subsidizing transportation, car use wouldWould like the group, OK maybe just myself if I'm the only one that
> be much less popular, due to its much higher cost, since not all
> taxpayers would be forced to pay for the activities of some.
doesn't get it, to get in sync on this.
Exactly what are the amounts and items subsidized. Acording to the
Department of Xportation, most federal Highway money comes from gas
taxes, the rest, a much lesser amount, coming from income taxes.
I have been led to think that a business can write off the money lost
in offering free parking to its employees (customers as well?). This
would be a lot if the diference is based on what could have been built
in lieu of a parking lot (a side; denser building means higher
property values; I would be living in Venice, New York or San
fransico now otherwise).
So what else SPECIFICALLY is there? No pollution costs, etc. please.
I can't use that at a party, even in Austin. The biggest cost I see
isn't hidden, but is still sizable -- the direct and upkeep cost of
car ownership $5K-$6.5K for most, a lot less to me and mine.
Thanks in advance.
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "J.H. Crawford" <mailbox@c...>
> I see a window of opportunity here. The next year or two are goingShould we be targeting the transportation departments as well as ,
> to be years of budget crises in the USA, especially at the state
> level. ....................
> Are we ready? Can we organize to take adantage of this opportunity?
> Can we start a massive program of writing to legislators and news
> media? Can anyone take responsibilty for coming up with the best
> numbers we've got and working them into some generalized press
> releases? Can others tailor these for local environments and get
> them into the right hands? Lots of work, but some real chance of
> a payback.
maybe even preceding lobbying the legislators? These guys are are the
ones under presure; there's all that federal money, waiting to be
matched, because we are still driving and paying those federal gas tax
dollars, so the federal pile keeps getting bigger, and unused. Won't
the state folks know that as the DIRECT gas taxes go up, the gas usage
goes down. Which I think, if this is in fact so, can be properly
countered with, sure, now you'll have all the money you need to do
what ever people want to pay for.... so trtansit, and most central,
dense building and rebuilding, wil get a fare shake.
To me this is the thing we have to discuss, besides the numbers, and
were it comes from now stuff; that is we need to diccuss what we think
the very astute sense of the xportation administrators to know that if
they raise the gas taxes, revinue, especially in a recovered economy
will be down from what it could be in the current methodology. I
think that the game has in fact changed in that toll roads are now
the previlent building mode.... discussion by more informed