Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

NYTimes article

Expand Messages
  • 456 jkl
    May 5, 2002 Moving to Manhattan, for the Children s Sake By TRISH HALL MANY Manhattan parents think about moving to the suburbs, or at least to a leafier
    Message 1 of 2 , May 4, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      May 5, 2002

      Moving to Manhattan, for the Children's Sake
      By TRISH HALL

      MANY Manhattan parents think about moving to the
      suburbs, or at least to a leafier borough, in search of a
      better life for their children. They think about the benefits of
      open space and back yards, of quiet streets where it's safe
      and easy to learn to ride a bike.

      Laurie Marvald and Gary Metzger did the reverse. They sold
      a three-bedroom colonial-style house in Bayside, Queens,
      and moved last fall to a two-bedroom co-op apartment in a
      high-rise in Chelsea with their three young sons. They did it
      because they believe that Manhattan is a better place to
      raise Adam, 11, Ryan, 8, and Jack, 4.

      Like most changes, theirs was driven by a number of
      desires and needs. Ms. Marvald started to think that for all
      of the time she and the children were spending in
      Manhattan, they might as well live there. For the last three
      years, she had loaded them into the car and driven into
      Manhattan after school so that Adam could rehearse for
      plays put on by TADA!, a children's theater company on
      West 28th Street in Chelsea. "They would do their
      homework in the car," she said. "And I must have listened
      to 150 books on tape."

      While Ms. Marvald could see that her children liked
      Manhattan — Ryan, she said, is artistic and likes to go to
      museums— she had to admit that she also preferred it.
      And Mr. Metzger was working in Manhattan every day, at the
      architecture firm of Metzger/Metzger, which he started with
      his brother but now runs on his own.

      Both Ms. Marvald and Mr. Metzger grew up in Queens, she
      in Floral Park and he in Bayside. They are both architects
      and met working at a Manhattan firm. Although they once
      lived in Manhattan, they remember the moment when they
      decided to leave because they could no longer stand the
      noise. Every summer, Mr. Metzger said, Con Ed would
      come and dig up the street. One morning, he said, "We
      couldn't hear each other." That was it.

      Still, Ms. Marvald said, she always thought of Queens as a
      temporary solution, not a place she would live for 11 years.
      She has always preferred Manhattan. "I like walking
      everywhere," she said. Her husband agreed that she was
      the prime mover behind their return to Manhattan.

      "Laurie likes the excitement," he said. "She always has."

      Before deciding to move into Manhattan,Ms. Marvald spent
      a year researching the schools in Community School
      District 2, which stretches from the Upper East Side to the
      Battery and encompasses parts of the West Side, like
      TriBeCa and Chelsea. Her children were in programs for
      gifted children in Queens, and she wanted to make sure
      there were comparable choices in Manhattan.

      When she determined that there were, she decided to start
      looking for a place. Another mother with a child at TADA!
      referred her to Kenny Blumstein, a broker at the Corcoran
      Group. Mr. Blumstein was relentless, she said, refusing to
      believe they couldn't find an apartment for five people for
      $600,000 or less, the amount their house was likely to
      bring.

      They wanted a loft, but lofts were proving too expensive.
      One day, Mr. Blumstein persuaded them to look at a large
      two-bedroom apartment in a postwar building in Chelsea,
      one it turned out they had seen before, when a loft was
      their prime goal. It was very short on charm, with dark
      green walls and battered floors, but it was at least
      $200,000 less than other apartments that were 1,400
      square feet, Ms. Marvald said. And so last spring, they
      bought it, although unfortunately, they said, Mr. Blumstein
      didn't get any of the commission. When they had seen the
      apartment early in their search, at an open house, they
      hadn't put his name down by theirs when they signed in.

      The place needed work, and over the summer they ripped
      out the floors and put in new oak strip ones; they took out
      the kitchen and put in Ikea cabinets and a granite
      countertop. The Ikea cabinets cost less than $2,000 and
      were installed by Mr. Metzger's brother, Jim, who now has
      his own architecture firm in Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.

      They did keep the eight-burner Garland stove. "At our board
      approval meeting," Ms. Marvald said, "Gary told them we
      would be subletting some of our burners."

      THEY made the apartment seem much larger by removing
      some walls and opening up the kitchen. But they kept the
      den, probably the original dining room, as a place to watch
      television.

      Throughout the apartment, they built ingenious storage that
      has made it possible for five people to live in the space. A
      large closet in their dining area is a general utility room,
      with wall hooks holding scooters for the children and a
      motorized one for Mr. Metzger.

      In the boys' bedroom, he designed bunk beds that take part
      of a wall but don't feel crowded, as well as a closet that
      holds all their games, toys and clothes. In the master
      bedroom, they tore out some small closets and replaced
      them with a walk-in closet for their clothing.

      Before leaving Queens, they sold about 80 percent of their
      belongings, Ms. Marvald said, and the children got rid of
      about two-thirds of their toys.

      Although they have less space, they don't feel cramped.
      They had a spacious house in Queens, Ms. Marvald said,
      but "everyone was in the kitchen all of the time."

      Ms. Marvald and Mr. Metzger are a bit surprised by the ease
      with which the children have taken to their new, smaller
      home. "I would say to them, `Doesn't it feel small to you?' "
      Ms. Marvald said, "and they would say,`No.' "

      On a recent Saturday, she was about to walk Adam to his
      rehearsal at TADA!, where he is acting in his ninth
      production, a musical called "The Perfect Monster," which
      closes today. Living in Manhattan, she said, has been what
      she hoped for, and more. "The city has become so child
      oriented," she said. "I wanted the experience of raising kids
      in the city, of going for a walk and every day seeing
      something new."

      Although they didn't move in to their new apartment until
      mid- November, their children started in Manhattan schools
      in September, and she drove them in every day. After Sept.
      11, she said, she would have the experience of sitting in
      the parks talking to families who were planning to move
      out. "We were moving in," she said. "It was a little scary,
      every morning with the National Guard at the tunnel, but it
      was a done deal."

      Mr. Metzger can now walk to his office at 23rd Street and the
      Avenue of the Americas, rather than taking a train. That's
      not the unmixed blessing that it might sound. "I miss my
      reading time," he said. `'I haven't finished a book since I
      moved in."

      Indeed, they didn't hate Bayside; it just didn't ultimately suit
      them.

      But before they left, they made sure of one thing: that their
      youngest child, Jack, learned to ride a bicycle, just as his
      brothers had.  

      ***
      http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/05/realestate/
      05HABI.html?homepageinsidebox
      --

      _______________________________________________
      Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Email.com
      http://www.email.com/?sr=signup
    • 456 jkl
      Offshore Oil Pollution Comes Mostly as Runoff, Study Says By ANDREW C. REVKIN Most oil pollution in North American coastal waters comes not from leaking
      Message 2 of 2 , May 24, 2002
      • 0 Attachment
        Offshore Oil Pollution Comes Mostly as Runoff, Study Says
        By ANDREW C. REVKIN


        Most oil pollution in North American coastal waters comes not from leaking tankers or oil rigs, but rather from countless oil-streaked streets, sputtering lawn mowers and other dispersed sources on land, and so will be hard to prevent, a panel convened by the National Academy of Sciences says in a new report.

        The thousands of tiny releases, carried by streams and storm drains to the sea, are estimated to equal an Exxon Valdez spill — 10.9 million gallons of petroleum — every eight months, the report says.

        When fuel use on water, either inland or offshore, is also taken into account, the report says, about 85 percent of the 29 million gallons of marine oil pollution in North America each year comes from users — drivers, businesses, boaters — and not from the oil industry. In particular, spills from tankers, barges and other oil transport vessels totaled less than a quarter-million gallons in 1999, down from more than six million in 1990.

        The shift follows a substantial tightening of environmental regulations on oil exploration and shipping since the grounding of the Exxon Valdez in 1989. The new report is the academy's third examination of marine oil pollution since 1975, but the first since the Exxon Valdez spill.

        More than half the oil runoff in North America occurs along the East Coast from Virginia to Maine, the report said. That concentration of oil pollution, the authors said, reflects the density of people, vehicles and other sources in the corridor from Washington to Boston.

        Oil carried in runoff is particularly damaging, the report said, because it typically ends up discharged by rivers and streams into bays and estuaries that "are often some of the most sensitive ecological areas along the coast." That relentless runoff carries traces of a host of chemicals that are found in most fuels and that can harm marine life even in low concentrations.

        "We've all seen the sheen on the streets," said one author, Dr. Nancy N. Rabalais, a marine biology professor at the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. "That eventually is going to run off and end up in a river. The cumulative effect of human activity all over the landscape eventually gets into the sea."

        Worldwide, the panel estimated, 70 percent of marine oil pollution comes from fuel users, not producers or shippers.

        The panel said one significant source of oil pollution, though a much smaller one than fuel use on land, was the two-cycle engines still used in many outboard boats and personal watercraft like Jet Skis. Those engines use a small amount of unburned fuel as lubricant and then expel it. The report encouraged the Environmental Protection Agency to continue to promote a shift to different engine designs, and groups representing the watercraft industry said yesterday the move was under way.

        The academy's findings echo a growing consensus in recent years that "nonpoint" pollution, from countless dispersed sources, poses one of the nation's most serious and intractable environmental problems. With tankers or oil fields, specific agencies can require double hulls or dikes to hold back leaks, but no agency polices parking-lot runoff.

        "There are lots of good regulations in the Clean Water Act that deal with point discharges, and we have the Coast Guard to deal with oil spills," Dr. Rabalais said. "But no matter whether it's pesticides, fertilizers, oil or grease, we're not to the point of managing these things. And they are very important."

        The study, by 14 scientists and engineers, including some from the oil industry, was produced by the National Research Council, the branch of the National Academy of Sciences that conducts independent studies for the government.

        While emphasizing the problem of oil pollution in runoff, the report noted a sharp drop in the number and volume of accidental spills by tankers and barges in American waters since the Valdez grounding. Even with that improved record, the report said, it is important for governments to continue intensifying safeguards against such accidents, because the transporting of oil around the world will increase steadily.

        But it is just as important to start focusing on ways to better measure oil releases destined for waterways and to pinpoint their sources, the report said.

        William D. Hickman, a spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute, a trade group in Washington, said the report correctly highlighted both progress in the oil industry and continuing pollution problems.

        The report also said more work should be done to understand the effect of oil seeping naturally from underwater deposits in the ocean. Humans release about 210 million gallons of petroleum a year into the seas, the report said, while natural seepage adds 180 million gallons.

        *****
        --
        _______________________________________________
        Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Email.com
        http://www.email.com/?sr=signup
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.