RE: [carfree_cities] Urban horses(revisited)
- Hello Simon,
Sorry for responding to this thread at such a late date, but your message
came in while I was on holidays and I'm only getting to it now.
I find your thoughts on urban-horse-use interesting and, in an odd way,
romantic. I just wondered how you or others have proposed to deal with the
eventual biological needs of horses. My reading has pointed me to a number
of publications from around the turn of the century (1900) that justified
the increased use of motorized transportation simply because horses tended
to produce too much 'added baggage'.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
From: Simon Baddeley [mailto:s.j.baddeley@...]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 5:25 AM
To: Mark@...; Carfree Cities List
Cc: Slower Initiative Speeds; Cllr Gita Rae; Andrew Coulson DLGS;
Subject: [carfree_cities] Urban horses(revisited)
Such prescience. Hardly have I floated some enquiries about use of urban
horses than I pick up the Birmingham Evening Mail yesterday and there on
page 7 is a half-page story saying that "Birmingham is bidding to become the
first city in Britain to bring back traditional horse-drawn taxi carriage
services." The story mentions that such services are "ever-present" in many
European cities and for visitors to "New York's central park".
The idea will be trailed in our Jewellery Quarter at the area's day long
Street Craft Fair and Antiques Market. Martin Parnham of Festival organisers
"Town Centre Management" says "We think it would be ideal for Birmingham
city centre because large parts of the city are pedestrianised. They really
are pleasant and I can envisage them driving up and down Broad Street."
I don't think it's a situation of being able to pick up one of these at New
Street Station and ask to be taken home (2 miles) and "don't spare the
horses!" so's I can watch a TV programme, but it suggests these
possibilities are around and will stay in the right conditions.
I recall that one of the last of the brewers drays was driven off London
Streets about 7 years ago because of recurring contretemps with impatient
motorists. I suspect these things cannot work where they must share streets
with cars whose drivers think they should be able to go faster. If all
traffic were to be slowed down so that drivers did not get "held-up" by
horse drawn traffic the situation could improve.
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT
00 44 121 554 9794
07775 655842 mobile
Campus 00 44 121 414 4999
The late David Welch - local government officer in Aberdeen in the 1980s:
"The technology of the cart is that of 50 years ago, but there are now
lighter stronger materials than those traditionally used. Nylon bushes are
available for wheels. There are substitutes laboriously cleaned chrome
chains and fittings. The College of Technology in the city is co-operating
in looking at ways of introducing modern materials. There are advantages in
introducing horses beside utility and economy. There is the question of
civic cheerfulness. Nothing is quite so agreeable to the eye as a pair of
large horses and a cart, their amiability in sharp distinction to the
menace and aggression of the motor car. Their hooves make a cheerful
rhythmical clatter, and the iron shod wheels of the cart grate with a
continuous burr upon the carriageway like the drone of a bagpipe. They
elicit smiles from adults and waves from the children."
To Post a message, send it to: carfree_cities@...
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
Group address: http://www.egroups.com/group/carfree_cities/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> My reading has pointed me to a numberUrban gardens.
> of publications from around the turn of the century (1900) that justified
> the increased use of motorized transportation simply because horses tended
> to produce too much 'added baggage'.
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.
A few parks, a few horses -- no big deal (lay-opinion).
What are we going to do -- to put the hoof on the other shoe -- with all of
the "motorized transportation garbage in our air." SMOG, exhaust. What about
those fumes from buses?
Perhaps balance is better. Not all of one nor all of the other. Yes, the
grass is generally greener on the other side of the fence.