RE: [carfree_cities] Something for everyone....
In Canada, the taxation powers of government are rather precisely laid out
in the constitution. The gist of it is that the federal government
has huge powers of taxation, the provinces have much lower powers, and the
lower levels of government have almost no power.
I think the clearest indication of this is that everywhere but Quebec (who
haven't ratified the constitution), the provinces can't charge any form of
income tax, and thus have to get the feds to collect a tax on their behalf
and forward it to them.
As I understand it, the feds have the income tax, excise taxes, tarriffs,
duties, and apparently also sales taxes. The provinces have, sales taxes and
rolalty taxes on resources.
I am not quite clear on what forms of tax the local government can charge,
but given what they do charge, I would guess they only have the property
Now, clearly history has shown us that these constitutional limits on
taxation have been ignored, bent, and mishandled (ie. the provincial income
tax), so I may have the odd one of the above wrong.
>From: "Lanyon, Ryan" <lanyonry@...>_____________________________________________________________________________________
>To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com>
>Subject: RE: [carfree_cities] Something for everyone....
>Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:20:31 -0500
>What's really great is that there's a provincially imposed ceiling on
>property taxes for commercial land, forcing the burden of cost (from
>downloaded services!) to the residential tax base.
>This discussion (and others) lead me to question the utility of a property
>tax. Generally, it does not redistribute wealth as accurately as other
>taxes, it is widely subject to economic cycles, and it does not address
>one's ability to pay. Do municipalities in other jurisdictions levy income
>taxes or sales taxes, in addition to property taxes? AFAIK, municipalities
>in Ontario (and Canada) may only levy property tax and charge user fees for
>I suppose the other question is what do those taxes pay for? We've got
>'soft' services coming from the property tax base than we used to,
>for scarce resources with 'hard' services (municipalities are not allowed
>run deficits anymore). The good news is that this had led to a tighter
>evaluation of the need for new and expanded roads. The public is also much
>more aware of how much the transportation system costs.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ronald Dawson [SMTP:rdadddmd@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 11:38 PM
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: RE: [carfree_cities] Something for everyone....
> > Lanyon, Ryan wrote:
> > >In Ontario, we recently moved to an actual value assessment for
> > >taxes. Part of the problem is that those who purchased a property in
> > >affordable neighbourhood many decades ago may now find themselves
> > retired,
> > >on a fixed income, house paid off, but land values around them have
> > >skyrocketed. This is typical in middle class and affluent inner city
> > areas
> > >that were cheaper in the 60s and have since been revitalized. The case
> > of
> > >the widowed grandmother living in Ottawa's Glebe who can no longer
> > >her property taxes is commonly cited.
> > Well that's Mike Harris and the "Nonsense Revolution (TM)" for you.
> > Dawson
> > To Post a message, send it to: carfree_cities@...
> > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> > carfree_cities-unsubscribe@...
> > Group address: http://www.egroups.com/group/carfree_cities/
>To Post a message, send it to: carfree_cities@...
>To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
>Group address: http://www.egroups.com/group/carfree_cities/
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com