RE: [carfree_cities] Another battle in Seattle?
- Mark Watson wrote:
>I believe (hope) that it passed because it was seen as a tax revolt. I sayThis I-745 sounds really crooked. Dawson
>'hope' because they're at it again [ http://www.no745.org ] This
>initiative carries no such tax break, unless you are in the road building
>industry (it make road materials free of taxes!). It is a "more roads will
>help" effort that will hopefully fail.