Why are Vancouver's Hornby & Dunsmuir lanes "exprimental"?
- Odd news report, written to sound pejorative. yet it shows that:
*Car travel times were affected only "marginally."
*The number of cyclists (especially women) increased dramatically
*"Opposition hasn't changed much"--but majority of respondents
support the lanes
*Business vacancies along the routes dropped from 12% to 2%
So why "experimental"? Why make it sound as though there were huge
problems, which the exposition shows to be benefits instead? Why the
desperation to make them seem likek a failure? Why are the survey
results couched in terms of making the increase in support sound
Was the extension of the study time decided on in hopes of proving
they "should be" removed?
The things we put up with....
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]