Re: Passive Houses for indoor temperature control
- Is it possible to spread the vision?
In the same way that the ads are teling us we don't have enough, we
aren't happy until we have ???, we are inferior etc (a solution to not
buying a pickup is dont' watch TV!), we will probably need the same
advertisers and media to sell Passive Houses, car free cities etc.
A reason why the Passive House movement is gaining momentum is because
it actually works. Buildings that take advantage of the sun to heat,
are superinsulated and airtight to reduce heat losses require more
thought at the design stage and more money spent on the build so the
investment is long term, not short term.
We are constantly thinking in the short term.
It's pretty natural to ask what's in it for me?
How do you sell long term thinking. Can you sell it?
--- In email@example.com, "Ron Wolf" <ronetele13@...> wrote:
> Your reply to my question as to why passive solar seems to be gaining
> momentum more easily than Car Free was very well thought out and
> articulate. My eyes are opened, in a helpful way. Thank you.
> Thinking of your observation that "we have now had many decades of
> advertising to build expectations of the ideal life", I got a laugh of
> recognition in reading a recently republished Dave Barry column that
> speaks to the influence of advertising in putting pickup truck
> ownership high on the list of needs of many American males.
> Truck ads: Like a crock --->
> Might as well laugh.... And, as a American, though, perhaps, a
> relatively enlightened one, I am still amazed by how the typical Euro
> lifestyle of comparatively small living spaces in close the close
> quarters of multi-family buildings seems to make no difference to the
> good attitude and happiness of the population in general. On the
> contrary people here seem to be more happy and less pissed off than
> the typical American suburban dweller who is busily isolating in
> relative luxury....
> Is it possible to spread this vision?
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "chbuckeye" <coleridge3150@>
> > --- In email@example.com, "Ron Wolf" <ronetele13@> wrote:
> > > - looking at how/why the passive house movement is gaining actual
> > > investment and progressing in contrast to the long lingering
> > > dreaming/hoping of the car free movement.
> > >
> > > - recognizing that people interested in passive will have
> > > overlap with those interested in car free. Perhaps the movements
> > > be somehow joined?
> > >
> > > - recognizing that multi-family housing favors both lower energy use
> > > and car free transportation, bringing multi-family into the car free
> > > idea as a primary facilitator.
> > One possible factor, particularly in the U.S., is that we have now had
> > many decades of advertising to build expectations of the ideal life as
> > suburban sprawl. Apartment or city living is seen as being unpleasant
> > due to closer proximity to unpleasant neighbors.
> > The passive house movement alleviates one source of friction with
> > close neighbors -- noise. The superior insulation not only greatly
> > slows heat transfer, but it also blocks almost all noise from a
> > neighbor. Perhaps that has won some converts.
> > Another factor is that the passive house allows most people to
> > continue living with the same habits and behaviors as before, while
> > saving money over time due to lower heating and cooling costs.
> > Suburbanites see carfree living as requiring a change in behavior, and
> > so are reluctant to truly consider it, even if it would bring monetary
> > savings from not having a car. Monetary savings without having to
> > change behavior is much more attractive.
> > Finally, the US truly has a terrible transit system outside of its
> > roadways. The US has seen decades of car-centric development,
> > occupies a large area, and most of the US lacks quality public
> > transit. Americans typically have family and friends scattered all
> > over the country, as younger people pursue jobs and older people
> > escape the snow for warmer climates. Without an adequate train
> > system, the only choice for travel is by air (expensive, unpleasant,
> > subject to unpredictable winter weather, often impractical for
> > transporting a large amount of furniture or Christmas gifts, etc.) or
> > by the convenience and go-anywhere, go-anytime ability of their car,
> > even in the face of long distances. I think many Americans are afraid
> > to give up their car because it would really constrain their travel to
> > close family and friends. Someday the world's demand for their share
> > of the oil will change that, but until we build a quality rail network
> > to provide comfortable and timely travel few truly carfree
> > developments will be built.
> > I see these European passive house developments as providing some hope
> > for the US, however. If properly constructed and organically grown,
> > they probably would provide the basis for becoming wonderful carfree
> > cities in the future. For example, by building parking garages at the
> > perimeter and extending rail through the city, rail can become more
> > convenient. As the rail network becomes more extensive, the car is
> > needed less and less. Perhaps if we design the parking garage for
> > future conversion to other use, such as a warehouse, for example, then
> > the passive house movement truly could be a step on the path to
> > carfree cities. It certainly seems like it would have a better chance
> > of mainstream adoption in the US than going straight to carfree
> > cities, which would require an immediate change in behavior patterns.