Re: [carfree_cities] Where does this GHG (greenhouse gas) focus take us?
- The California case is one where the higher level of government is
simply trying to kick responsibility downstairs. For example,
Proposition 13 is a very unfair and irresponsible law at the state
level that needs to be repealed, but no one will touch it. It encourages
sprawl because cities have an incentive to zone out children and zone
in Walmarts and car dealers. Also, the state government just cut operating
support to PT by $1.3 Billion annually.
Quoting "J.H. Crawford" <mailbox@...>:
> Our old friend Colin Leath posted this on the Carfree Network
> list and I thought this list would also like to see it:
> Sitting in on a San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) meeting
> about approval of a Regional Transportation Plan in which fear was
> expressed about being sued by the California Attorney General over GHG
> emissions was eye-opening. (some background:
> http://www.planetizen.com/node/24990 ). A fear-based, GHG-focused
> argument is having an effect on Southern California urban planning. (I
> wish quality-of-life-based reasoning were sufficient.)
> I've been half-wondering in the back of my mind where this GHG focus
> would take us if people followed it completely.
> As usual, George Monbiot is ahead of the game:
> (1) Leave the carbon in the ground:
> (2) Run everything off renewable power. The only thing he figures
> could not be are airplanes--I believe he discusses this in detail in
> his book _Heat_ :
> """The diplomats who started talks in Bali yesterday should be
> discussing *the complete decarbonisation of the global economy*.
> It is not impossible. In a previous article I showed how by switching
> the whole economy over to the use of electricity and by deploying the
> latest thinking on regional supergrids, grid balancing and energy
> storage, you could run almost the entire energy system on renewable
> power(14). The major exception is flying (don't expect to see
> battery-powered jetliners [what about liquid H? - see below]) which
> suggests that we should be closing rather than opening runways."""
> [Monbiot] urges his readers "to remember that these privations affect
> a tiny proportion of the world's people. The reason they seem so harsh
> is that this tiny proportion almost certainly includes you."
> Monbiot also discusses the need for carbon capture. An Australian says
> this can be done on a massive scale, cheaply, by improved plowing
> techniques which create deep humus:
> (using his plow design, --but other plows do the same. Note he also
> advocates nuclear power, and leaving fossil fuel fossil). I learned
> about Yeomans from Darren Doherty ( http://permaculture.biz/ ) at
> Quail Springs.
> Also: Some in the US say the GHG emissions in China and India are a
> main part of the problem. But the perceptive see those are our
> emissions exported to them (as they produce what we import):
> Schwarzenegger, too, communicates this:
> Also, I've been wondering in the back of my mind:
> What will people do when/if they look at being carbon-neutral on an
> individual level?
> What will people do when/if they apply all the radical measures some
> advocate for national economies to personal economies?
> I agree, with Gore, that personal life changes are not enough, but it
> is fun to consider.
> (there is a movement to make it easier and more mainstream to work
> less, consume less:
> http://www.timeday.org/ )
> Why _is_ anyone working full time, if not to sequester carbon?? (the
> purpose of our lives now?)
> The greatest work is the design and implementation of carbon-neutral
> or sequestering systems? (including the supporting legal and political
> Lawton's "MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY and permaculture" thread seems
> not-too-offtopic at this point.
> And for no other reason than not to lose track,
> Diana DeRubertis writes on living in a failed new urban development in
> San Diego's Mission Valley:
> http://www.planetizen.com/node/22133 "Pedestrians Lost In The New Suburbia"
> Her planetizen blog posts: http://www.planetizen.com/user/10382
> And here's a new development planned for Mission Valley that is trying
> to be greener:
> Here's links on H-powered aircraft:
> ----- ### -----
> J.H. Crawford Carfree Cities
> mailbox@... http://www.carfree.com