7663Re: [carfree_cities] RE: ETT and Canterbury Tales
- Sep 17, 2004Cars will spread but in an increasingly tightly regulated and bureaucratised
road environment. In this sense the arguments about efficiency make a sort
of sense - especially for road freight, and as the internal combustion
engine is replaced by more eco-friendly power sources).
But the freedom of the car is highly conditional - but try explaining that
to the new breed of highly politicised petrol heads taken in by those ads of
cars driving along empty roads (in Bosnia? South East Turkey?).
These dopes are equipping (or buying pre-equipped) cars with telemetry and
accompanying paperwork that will further embed their "personal transport
units" in a regulated infrastructure equivalent to that which now manages
flying. The last real car drivers are the fly boy joy riders but they will
increasingly become out priced outlaws - as has happened with motorcycles
now mainly used by the wealthy or dispatch riders. Cars will be highly
controlled office spaces from which "drivers" (actually the old type driver
- unless on a test track - is becoming increasingly a passenger) will
communicate their wish not only to find a parking space but a travel slot in
convoys. Explore the websites on the future of the car. Sure it will be
designed to play on the old toad dreams (poop poop) of the freedom of the
road - but I predict the opening of the Jeremy Clarkson Heritage Motorway -
a stretch of 20 miles or so of asphalt where nostalgic drivers can gather at
weekends to recover the joys of vroom vroom and speedophilia.
Simon (who started cycling after the freedom went out of driving)
> From: Jym Dyer <jym@...>
> Organization: Still We Ride
> Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
> To: <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: [carfree_cities] RE: ETT and Canterbury Tales
>> Eventually bikes and trains proved to be unsustainable because
>> of the greater efficiency of the car, motorcycle and airplane.
> =v= What an odd statement. The latter three are *far* less
> efficient and sustainable than the former three!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>