4508Re: [carfree_cities] Re: An Argument for Fee-based Roads (long)
- Apr 5, 2002
> What's wrong with your argument? It assumes that sunk costs should beI'm a first year student, so could you clear something up for me before
> paid for in the exact same way that marginal costs are paid for. And
> in fact they shouldn't because they can't.
I give opinions based on confusion. When you are talking about sunk
costs, you mean fixed costs for the initial infrastructure? And marginal
costs derived only from the portion of variable costs, not total costs,
used to provide service for one customer? From my understanding of what
marginal costs are, they include both fixed and variable costs.
100 Riverdale Drive
Sydney NS B1R 1P4
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>