4311Re: [carfree_cities] More pollution from slower traffic
- Feb 6, 2002Andras Toth said:
>In Hungary where I come from there is an argument popping up timeand again
>about the harmful effect of slowing down the traffic. In manynewspaper
>articles we can read that cars going slower pollute more, andtherefore
>enlarging a road and building tunnels is justifiable and blahblah.More
>And it is true, as we know that the right speed for optimal fuel
>consumption for a car is way over 50 km/h (not to mention 30 km/h).
>fuel = more pollution.convincing
>I can imagine a few counterarguments, but they are not entirely
>to me.we have
>1. "Slower cars mean fewer cars. This counterbalances the increase in
>pollution per car." Has this been proved? Also, even if it is true
>to face the much more far-reaching and difficult argument aboutreducing
>the amount of car traffic, as some people would object that they donot
>want to be restricted in their access to the town.The only way to speed up cars is to add road capacity, which
seems always to draw more cars, slowing things down again
within a few years. You end up worse off than you started:
more cars driving slowly.
>2. "Slower cars mean fewer accidents. Breathing in polluted air isnot as
>bad as being hit by a car." But with this argument, how can you be anYou're proceeding from the assumption that one has to accept
>environmentalist and a protector of civil rights at the same time?
dangerous, polluting objects on the street. Don't accept that
>3. "You can't live in a town turned into a network of highways." Andtheir
>answer could be: "If that's the price to pay for less pollution, whynot?"
The answer is simply that you can't build your way out of
congestion (and therefore out of pollution), and that trying
to do so ultimately makes the situation even worse.
>And then you have been dragged again into the tricky grounds of townand
>aesthetics and social ethics etc. Isn't there a more straightforward
>simple answer?Don't be afraid to argue this point, but I grant you that you'll
only be likely to win your argument on the technical issues--
people just don't seem to care about aesthetics any more. sign.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>