Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

349

W2SP 2012 CFP - Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2012 Workshop Call for

W2SP 2012 CFP - Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2012 Workshop Call for Papers On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you
Larry Koved
Dec 20, 2011
#349
 
348

Re: ADsafe[]

... This is the Firefox distribution I see at Yahoo: 4.0 1.60% 3.6 21.78% 3.5 2.99% 3.0 1.93% 2.0 0.39%
Douglas Crockford
Apr 19, 2011
#348
 
347

Re: ADsafe[]

... So, fixed in Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 patch releases. Firefox 4 is out already. Is anyone seeing hits from downrev Firefoxes? /be_._,___
Brendan Eich
Apr 19, 2011
#347
 
346

Re: ADsafe[]

... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507453 http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/07/14/hidden-firefox-properties-revisited/
Douglas Crockford
Apr 19, 2011
#346
 
345

Re: ADsafe[]

Care to post a citation for the Firefox[-6] bug? Google doesn't do a very good job searching for [-6]. Sounds pretty bizarre, if -1, -3, and -6 are special.
Freeman, Tim
Apr 18, 2011
#345
 
344

ADsafe[]

ADsafe took a big usability hit when the Firefox[-6] bug was discovered. ADsafe took the necessary but highly undesirable step of outlawing the use of the []
Douglas Crockford
Apr 18, 2011
#344
 
343

[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers

Final reminder! Submissions are due next Friday. Thanks. On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you participate in the
Larry Koved
Mar 18, 2011
#343
 
342

[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers

Reminder: The submission date is March 25, two weeks from tomorrow. On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you
Larry Koved
Mar 10, 2011
#342
 
341

[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers

On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you participate in the 5th annual workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy.
Larry Koved
Jan 18, 2011
#341
 
340

ADsafe

I updated the ADsafe DOM interface. Previously, a method like .getValue() could return undefined a single value an array of values depending on the number of
Douglas Crockford
Nov 11, 2010
#340
 
339

Re: adsafe

... Quite right. Thank you very much.
Douglas Crockford
Oct 26, 2010
#339
 
338

Re: adsafe

I mean calling the reject_name function with a name it returns true or false. For instance if I call reject_name('constructor') than i will get true because
Nagy Endre
Oct 26, 2010
#338
 
337

Re: adsafe

... On some browsers, accessing the constructor style would return a function, which is not desirable, so an exception is raised instead.
Douglas Crockford
Oct 26, 2010
#337
 
336

adsafe

Hi all, In the adsafe.js I found that the reject_name(name) function is used at three location in this "procedural" form. Ex. at line 1087 : getStyle: function
forewer2000
Oct 26, 2010
#336
 
335

ADSAFE.lib

ADSAFE.lib now subjects its name parameter to the same rules used generally on properties. Ankur Taly had discovered an attack by using a particular banned
Douglas Crockford
Sep 17, 2010
#335
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic