Re: geek test
- At 05:43 PM Friday 5/30/2008, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
>Bruce Bostwick wrote:Does the AFL-CIO know about this?
> > Kind of a hydrogen hydrate then? :D
>No, because there is no unionized hydrogen.
. . . ronn! :)
- Curtis Burisch wrote:
>It's an unionized hydrogen. Does that answer you rhetorical question?
>> No, because there is no unionized hydrogen. It could be
>> a hydric acid hydrate (or hydrous acid hydrate?) or a
>> oxygenydric acid hydrate.
> Union-ized, or un-ionized? ;)