Re: Hello (hello, hello)
- In a message dated 3/6/2006 6:05:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, julia@...
> go ahead and ask you now. What do you think about minicolumns?wow! I am impresed that you got to such a hard core science paper. The notion
> I read something about them that cited
> http://tinyurl.com/pdxv3 if that link broke
> and in the comments of the thing I read someone indicated that it's a
> controversial theory. I figure you know a lot more about brain
> structure than I do, so you'd be a reasonable person to ask.
that the cortex develops in columns is not as far as I know controversial.
The germinal matrix is the embryologic structure where neuronal precursors are
produced. These migrate to the surface of the brain along a scapholding made up
of other cells called radial astrocytes. The two major cell types in the
brain are neurons (the nerve cells that carry out the computational functions
(that is, the important stuff) and glial cells that provide other functions to the
brain in terms of maintaining the necessary chemical environment, forming the
linings of the brain, providing nurishment to the white matter, acting as the
immune cells of the brain etc. Astrocytes are the most common of these glial
cells. In the developing brain beginning in the second trimester. These glial
cells migrate away from the central cavities of the brain. The neurons then
grow out along the radial glial cells to reach their appropriate position. If
this process is disrupted or disorganized abnormalities of cortical formation
occur. When this process is focal clefts are produced in the brain extending
from the central cavities (the ventricles) to the surface of the brain. These
clefts are called schizencephaly. If the radial glial cells fail to migrate at
all or if the neurons migrate incorrectly. The cortex will be thickened
disorganized. The brain will not form normal gyri (the folds of the brain). The
extreme example of this is lisencephaly, litterly a smooth ungyrated brain. Not a
Not sure if this is what you wanted me to talk about. In what context did
this come up?
- Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> <<http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Music/04/25/worst.songs/index.html>>Yep - truly nauseating - but the wierd thing is that all these songs
> Howcum no one here came up with #4?
were incredibly popular at the time. They are nearly all top 10 hits,
many of them held number one for weeks.
(As opposed to the VH1 listing, more than half of which I'd never heard
What WERE these people thinking when they bought these records?
This email (including any attachments) is confidential
and copyright. The School makes no warranty about the
content of this email. Unless expressly stated, this
email does not bind the School and does not necessarily
constitute the opinion of the School.
If you have received this email in error, please delete
it and notify the sender.