Re: Brin: Re: old style conservatives\the white mans burden
- Atrocious. I commented right after your full and
complete remark, which was right above.
Your claims of victimization are as credible as the
--- Leonard Matusik <nanotreasures@...> wrote:
> I guess my comments would be rather_______________________________________________
> incommprehensible, if you're going to cut them away
> from the thread they were attached to. (how rude and
> self serving)
> I be happy to discuss the topic.
> If, of course, you'd like to get beyond looking at
> me like a bug through a microscope.
> But Hell, it is your blog, do what you want.
> L.Matusik MSN,etc
> David Brin <dbrin@...> wrote:
> It was not even remotely comprehensible what point
> intended here....
> --- Leonard Matusik wrote:
> > YAWN!
> > Iraq has little to do with oil (though it'd be
> > to be able to bid on it in 10 years; shit, the
> > India_China allience will be tough to bid against
> > then) and mostly to do with "the white man's
> > burden". If we're gonna keep our monoply on nukes
> > and "trump card" power, (and we WILL, thank you
> > much) then we have to be able to show that we can
> > responsable ass-kickers (or more responsible that
> > the competition)
> > I wouldn't be surprised to see customer service
> > surveys passed out in Iraq eventually.
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around