Micro v Chebacco
- Okay folks, not to get away from Yahoo--but to get away from yahoo (I
know I know things were going along just dandy and someone had to go
and mess with it, and they ask too many questions (and yea I agree)
but if you invite BIG BRO (the internet hydra)into your living room
you kind of have to expect BIG BRO will take advantage...) anyway, I
have a question....
I have both sets of plans in front of me (thank you Bink!). I've
been dreaming on it for months/years now. The question is, which
Chebacco or Micro. Hmmmmm...
Won't Chebacco point better, i.e., leave Micro over the lee horizon?
Won't she go faster off the wind too? We got some viscous currents
here in the Delta area of N.CA, the water she a-churns and a-boils
under those big bridges sometimes. And yea, I know they'll both point
like laser beams with their motors on, but I'm one of those 'since
I'm out sailing I wanna be sailin' people, and I know I'd drive the
crew batty about not wanting to start the engine, and I'd really
rather avoid that if I can.
And now, I know Micro might be more comfortable in the cabin (is
she?) and that's important for a happy crew. And I think she's cute
as a button, and there's something about tweaking the 'sailboats have
to look like sailboats' crowd that has a deep and maybe even maniacal
(sp?) appeal to me. But Chebacco also looks like she'd hold a
football team in that cockpit. It'd be nice to be able to take six
or eight PFD equipped kids out for happy sail around the pond on once
in a while. How many will Micro's cockpit hold, with at least
tacking room for the skip?
These are the deep question I ponder in those mystical moments in bed
between sleeps, and in the car, on the pot, and when my wife is going
on about projects around the house. (Uh oh, the secrets out!)(But I
kind of suspect she knows that anyway, I can see it in those rolling
I also know it's a stupid question (the navy told me there was no
such thing as a stupid questions, but they also said I'd get the see
the world, when all I got to see was the inside of a submarine...)
I know its a stupid question because the Chebacco's will be all gun-
ho about Chebacco, and the Micros will be batty about Micro, and
it'll all amout to nothing, but gee whiz, what are we all here for
anyway, if we all aren't a little gun-ho and batty about boats in the
John O'Neill, living it up here in sometimes sunny N. CA, (at least
when the lights are on) and remembering my beautiful sail with Bink
yesterday, with reefs tucked into our cozy Cartoppers (and we
needed 'em) and livin it up on the slough....What a life!
- Of course the 2.5 feet have to go to the top of the
mast -- with 2.5 feet on the bottom, the Micro would
lose quite a bit of its shallow draft -- kind of like
the Santa Monica Pier. ;-)
> > I haven't seen the plans for the tallermast(Micro) > > but imagine that the extra 2.5 feet is
> > the top where the mast is relatively smaller and__________________________________________________
> > not at the bottom where the real beef is.
> Actually, the bottom.
> I haven't seen the plans either, but some time ago a
> member of this group posted a message about the
> change and I took notes.
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/