Re: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe-type MICRO ?
- Bruce said about the SCAMP, "(Making it pretty, but not as hydrodynamic.)."That boat IS a chick magnet. Mike and I sailed past some weekend racers during the FL120, you know the ones with the $10k plus suit of kevlar sails on a J something, the bikini clad rail meat hollered out, "Love your cute boat!" I was thinking, "Love your..." anyway. It attracted women in the hotel parking lot and the burger joint too. Mike says it even attracts bikers. Don't know why about the bikers.BTW Somebody started this thread comparing an Old Shoe and a SCAMP. I generously provided my take on the SCAMP (I really can't shut up). How about a sailing report on the Old Shoe? I think it would be pretty functional and a good boat.Just saying,John BoyI have a blog! http://toon2sailor.blogspot.com/“Seaward ho! Hang the treasure! It's the glory of the sea that has turned my head.”Robert Louis Stevenson, Treasure Island
From: BruceHallman <hallman@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe-type MICRO ?
> c.ruzer says “I don't see how 12ft x 5ft Scamp covers Micro/open-Micro.”I did a isometric model of SCAMP and some of my observations included
that it seems odd to have a boat with a single flat plate bottom and
developed six panel topsides. To my sense of logic it seem more
sensible to put investment in the curvature down where the water
"sees" it. But SCAMP puts the curvature investment up where the human
eye's see it. Also,
that design in only 12ft attempts to compromise by having both a cuddy
and a cockpit. I haven't sailed a SCAMP full size, but it makes me
curious whether the cuddy feels cramped or the cockpit feels small; or
both. That said, I bet that SCAMP is a fun little boat to build and
- NO "GO AWAY SPAMMER!" posts!!! Please!
- no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, respamming, or flogging dead horses
- stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks, Fred' posts
- Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away
- Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax: (978) 282-1349
- Unsubscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Open discussion: email@example.com Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
- Thanks for your interest.
The work was done in 2004, then covered in MAIB Sept. 1, 2004 Vol. 22, No 8 p.28-29. We referred to it as 'MICRO-2'.
To the plans for Design #422 MICRO across three additional sheets were added modifications doable on any existing MICRO hull:
- shorter mainmast - 18'4" versus 23' -
- battened gaff main-sail for an overall sail-area of 210 versus 176, plus 65 sq. foot reaching spinnaker
- all set in a bow-tabernacle, bringing her hull-length to just over 16 feet,
- gaff mizzen on 2-foot shorter mizzen-mast
- moderate-angle fillets under her bow.
As stated in the MAIB piece in 2004, these three upgrade sheets are $75.
The complete plans-package has grown over the decades from 6 to 11 sheets and is available for $250 to build one boat.
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
----- Original Message -----From: Dave GentrySent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 12:59 PMSubject: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe-type MICRO ?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Mark Albanese <marka97203@...> wrote:
> I don't believe that is well-known. Is it possible to purchase just
> this sheet?
> > Myles,
> > in case your experience amongst waves would be alleviated by
> > this, MICRO has had a set of (addable) Vee-Nose fillets forward for
> > a good number of years now.
Yes, first I've heard of it, as well. Perhaps it's on the navigator plans . . . I haven't really studied them.
Anyway, they sound like a worthy addition. If I still had the Micro I built, I'd likely want them.