Re: [bolger] Peero
- Dig back in the Bolger group archive to November 24, 2007 for a good
discussion of Eeeek!
Also, have you seen the "Cheap Pages"?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:57 AM, aquatronclaus<aquatronboat@...> wrote:
> Good morning!
> I am a boatdealer from denmark, planning to start up a Peero - frame number
> 2 - will that stay permantly in the boat or is it temporary?
> Is the plans for the other small sailcanoe EEEK availebla for free download
> some where?
- I paddle mostly been in power boats most of my life pulling crab pots where the chesapeake and the intercoastal intersect I am about at mile 3 I don,t cartop just carry the boat down to the water here lately I have been lazy I built a small dolley to tote my canoe with. It is a old battered coleman , I was just building smaller boats with hopes of finding something lighter I am aprox 205-210 pounds most weeks I have built a coupla of peeros for neices and nephews a nieghborhood kid or 2 they do well in them . It don,t do to have a adult beverage or two with you and paying attention really pays off :)
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Rob Kearney" <rdkearney_99@...> wrote:
> Also, once you start messing around with the dimensions, you have
> to ask yourself what your real purpose of use is. Do you want a craft
> that's mainly sailed and occasionally paddled or vice-versa since
> dimensions that enhance one use may detract from the other. To me,
> with the current dimensions, this design looks like it might be a fair
> compromise between paddling and sailing for someone up to about 180
> lbs. At 11'6" it's probably going to be pretty easy to car-top but
> at that length, it sure isn't going to be any speed demon. I agree
> that just raising the sides to gain more freeboard to carry more
> weight will introduce some negatives.
> - Rob
> --- In email@example.com, "graeme19121984" <graeme19121984@> wrote:
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Rob Kearney" <rdkearney_99@> wrote:
> > >I wonder if would work better for you if it was
> > > stretched out to about 15.5' and widened about 2". I'm still kind of
> > > amazed that a mono-hull with a 2' beam can be successfully sailed but
> > > then I used to feel that way about sailing canoes in general.
> > That could do it as higher sides mean crew weight higher for double paddle use - higher, and... oops over we go! The low sides also allow leaning the upper body out to the side. The Eeek! has higher sides, but also lead ballast stability (and some prefer a single paddle). Bolger said it was unerving though, that, when paddling, you had to lie back prone quickly when you reflexively wanted to lean out as capsize threatened. Isn't bracing meant to save this situation?
> > Graeme