- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Bruce Hallman <bruce@h...> wrote:
>the geometry is trulyand what a fascinating shape it is indeed! We have ourselves a
> amazing (and fascinating), as the shape of the hull is essentially
> defined by only eleven points.
> for a screenshot
veritable design genius as our Hero :-) But it is boats and shapes
like this that make me sometimes awfully glad I'm fully occupied
with a boatbuilding project otherwise I would be forever building
till the end of my days trying to satisfy some deep down boat urge
Thanks for posting those threeD images Bruce,they are bitter sweet
Peter Lenihan, who can easily see a Diamond,standing-by and ready
for quick deployment,parked up on the roof of Windermere right
beside Sweet Pea,Spur2,June Bug,Aury Punt,Field
Mouse,Brick,Nymph....oh the madness :-)
- I'm not sure the quoting is still accurate in this thread. In any
case, I'm sure the Dynel is good if the issue is just abrasion.
However, I think at the partners, and perhaps elsewhere, localized
crushing is part of the picture. In that case I'm guessing fiberglass
would remain superior. Not that you couldn't have a bit of dynel over it.
--- In email@example.com, Harry James <welshman@...> wrote:
> One layer of dynel is 6 times as abrasion resistance as 1 layer of 6oz
> glass per some tests in Boatbuilder several years ago.
> pvanderwaart wrote:
> >> What about armoring the mast with fiberglass and epoxy at the
> > partners and other wear
> >> points? Or wrapping it with some other thing to prevent wear?