68159Re: 34' Economy Seagoing Cruiser - not even one image on web! (30 Odd Boats)
- Jun 13, 2012Au contraire!
--- In email@example.com, Mark Albanese <marka97203@...> wrote:
> That was not the idea. "I had the notion that a pointed stern without
> rocker would allow more ballast to be carried without increasing the
> size of the midsection." Not the same as less draft.
> Though larger over all, LM2 is an interesting contrast. I make the
> ballast required for him at 1900 of a total displacement of 11,000
> pounds, about a 5:1 ratio that's a lot less than what you've shown
> the Eeek! shaped boats to need.
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:47 AM, c.ruzer wrote:
> > ... so too much draft defeating the original idea of same
> > displacement on less immersed cross-section, ie. less draft?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>