67259Re: Scaled-down Single-handed Schooner
- Jan 17, 2012Hi Laszlo & all,
I clocked a little over 6 mph on the gps on one of my first sails with the SHS, in about 12 knots of wind, reaching. I had a 220 lb friend in the hold at the time, so it should do better with a lighter load :^) I haven't bothered with the gps recently though.
I have never hiked out. I also haven't been out in strong wind but I would reef or drop the jib before resorting to hiking out. SHS was designed with the idea that you sit on the bottom of the boat thereby providing human ballast as low in the hull as possible. Seems to work pretty well, particularly for really lazy sailors like me.
You get used to the heeling and it does stiffen up a lot once it is heeled over a certain amount. It would take a lot I think to knock it down.
You are right I should get busy and update the blog with some sailing pictures and stuff. I did mention the lazy gene earlier though...
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "lboatman@..." <lboatman@...> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up on the sailing characteristics. That will be
> very reassuring to have in the back of my mind when it starts to heel on
> the maiden voyage. It's interesting that in all the photos I've found on
> the web and in print that Susan's boat is always vertical and Tony's is
> always heeled. He's also mostly hiked out. I'm really looking forward to
> trying it out on the water now. BTW, what kind of speeds have you you
> Xynole - you're a better man than I am, Gunga Din. Now that you've had
> it a while, was the Xynole worth it? My thought was since it can't be
> launched off a beach that the bottom would be pretty safe. I expect that
> the keel and rudder would take all the impacts long before the bottom.
> I'm actually more worried about the bow, stern and sides smashing into
> pilings and other boats.
> One day when you have the time and inclination, it'd be fun if you added
> a post-launch section to your blog. Maybe some pictures under sail,
> observations about the sailing characteristics and lessons learned.
> You'd definitely have an audience.
> Have fun,
> --- In email@example.com, "efemiket" <mthompson0900@> wrote:
> > A couple of notes from my experience of building SHS which might be of
> general interest (already emailed you offline):
> > I share your horror of metal fasteners in wooden boats. The only metal
> fasteners used on my SHS are the bronze screws in the daggerboard which
> give the lead something to cling to, and some bronze screws reinforcing
> the cockpit and hold coamings. Everything else is just thickened epoxy
> glue, reinforced on the exterior of the hull with Xynole cloth
> (Kevlar-like, very tough and a lot more work to get filled nicely with
> resin - probably takes twice as much resin to get a smooth filled
> surface). The interior lumber and bulkheads were all just glued to the
> planks and bottom. I used 1 inch drywall screws to hold things in place
> until the glue cured, then removed them afterward. Everything is holding
> up well so far.
> > Like Susan Davis I upped the 100 lbs of lead to about 150, so that the
> daggerboard probably weighs about 180 lbs all in. This makes it a real
> pig to manhandle when launching and hauling out. Unless you're built
> like Tarzan it's a two-person operation to raise or lower this thing.
> Bolger says it sails 'on its ear' as designed. It is certainly more
> stable with the extra weight, but it is still sails on its ear in any
> kind of breeze - it stiffens up a lot after heeling well over, but you
> have to get used to it. I get concerned looks from my passengers in the
> hold sometimes, hehe. Having a smaller boat with a lighter daggerboard
> will make everything that much easier getting in and out of the water.
> > Mike
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>