From Patrick Navas
- My apologies to Rob and everyone else. I forgot that, for some reason, this message board cannot read quotation marks, etc. Here is my response attached. Rob, I do hope that you read and think through my response carefully.Best wishes to all,Patrick Navas
From: Rob <faithhasitsreasons@...>
Sent: Fri, May 28, 2010 3:25:08 PM
Subject: [biblicalapologetics] Re: Response to NIck Norelli and Robert Bowman
You've got that nonsense-character stuff corrupting your posts to the group again (see below for a sample). Please find another way to post your messages so that they won't be so hard to read.
In Christ's service,
--- In email@example.com, Patrick Navas <patrick_navas@...> wrote:
> Hello to all. I responded to Trinitarian apologist Nick Norelli and one of Bowman's common arguments in behalf of the Trinity on the Parchment and Pen Blog. After reading it again, I noticed some mistakes. Here is the revised version for those who might be interested:
> You wrote:
> “I also find it interesting how you freely use the adjective “Scriptural” to describe your belief that God is “self-loving” (although as a Trinitarian I actually affirm this since Father, Son, and Spirit are the same God) in spite of the fact that Scripture doesn’t actually articulate this. It seems that you take issue with Trinitarians doing things along these lines; why is that?”
> I used the term “scriptural” to refer to the general scriptural concept of “self-love” (‘…as you love yourself…’ Luke 10:27; Romans 13:9; ‘husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it…’ Ephesians 5:28-29).