the firstfruits of inerrancy
- what exactly was it that led you to conclude that the
orignal versions of the bible text, which you have
never seen, were inerrant?
More specifically, there was something about the
errant copies, that led you to conclude the originals
were inerrancy, since it is only the copies that you
have any access too. What was it?
With all the consquences of denying inerrancy (you'll
say it's a denial of the truth of God's word), then
you remain consistent, do you not....and deny the
spiritual maturity of any and all who deny inerrancy,
regardless of their Christian leadership skills or
biblical knowledge or conservative morality, right?
If you don't lash out like this against any and all
Christians who deny inerrancy, then how do you
maintain that they can be productive Christians,
serving the Lord, when they have denied what you
believe is essential doctrine?
Why don't you equate inerrancy deniers with JW's,
Mormons, Christian Scientists, and others who have
also (in your opinion) totally missed the basic
message of the bible?
Try Netflix today! With plans starting at only $5.99 a month what are you waiting for?