1807Re: [biblicalapologetics] Re: Response to Rob Bowman on 1 Cor. 8:6 (Patrick)
- Oct 12 6:07 AMRob,It's a relief to know that you do not promote tactics of that sort. They are awful. But I don't know if it will be clear to all that you posted that list in jest. I couldn't tell. That's why I asked.I'll be in touch soon with some short responses on Hebrews 1, your last posts, and then I will get to work on my review of your book. I finished reading it, and I am now half way through the footnotes. But my review/critique will take some time (probably a few months) to put together.Patrick
"Robert M. Bowman, Jr." <faithhasitsreasons@...> wrote:Patrick,
I did post it. The introduction is satirical. Surely you didn't
think I seriously advocated using those fallacies?
I'm leaving on a business trip.
In Christ's service,
--- In biblicalapologetics @yahoogroups. com, Patrick Navas
<patrick_navas@ ...> wrote:
> I read this on your Deity of Christ blog/page. Did you post
this? If not, are you an advocate or promoter of what follows?
> Answer Someone If You Have No Case
> Finding someone's argument too tough to handle? Over your head
in a matter of biblical exegesis, scientific evidence, or logical
validity? Don't despair. Now you can always respond to those smart-
alecks and put them in their place. These are field-tested methods
for diverting attention from the lack of substance in your argument.
Never be stuck again for a snappy comeback!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>