384Re: [beethovensonatas] RE: New Message about Group and Amazon Reviews
- Oct 13, 2013Richard writes:
[comparison with Kempff snipped]
> Overall, I believe that Ashkenazy demonstrates all the same qualitiesWhile I'm not a big fan of Kempff's Beethoven either - "delicate" and "small-scale" isn't what I want in Beethoven. But I don't hear much energy or drama in Ashkenazy's version, either. It's closer to the tempo that I want to hear, but still not quite fast enough, and he does little to shape his phrases, right from the start of the first movement. I feel as though I'm listening to a very gifted Julliard graduate who doesn't have much imagination, content to make nice sounds.
> of beauty as Kempff, but one doesn't find one's attention called to
> them. Instead, the effect on me is energy and drama.
> Bill, if there are some other recordings of Op 2-1 that you findYou and I have already mentioned some of them - Kovacevich (his tempo choices are often on the edge, but they work, at least for me), Gulda (the second commercial recording), Schnabel, Korstick, Goodyear, Buchbinder. They all provide a lot more in terms of drama and imagination than does Ashkenazy. While I can't put my hands on it, I think that I recall a really exceptional version by Kocsis. Even HJ Lim, while sometimes a little brutal, provides more of what I think that Beethoven asks for.
> superior, I'd be willing to try to listen to them and respond as well
> as I can in comparison to the Ashkenazy recording.
To be honest, I suspect that neither of us will "convert" the other - we have, I think, very different ideas about how Beethoven should be played.
> You also asked for suggestions of other Beethoven sonata performancesThanks - I will give those a try.
> by Ashkenazy that I consider excellent. I would recommend Op 10-3,
> 31-2 (Tempest), and 101. Those are all cases in which I find
> Ashkenazy's recording to be the best of which I am aware.
- << Previous post in topic