Re: [beam] thankx guys but one more question!
- "hacking" and "modifying" are two different words which mean the same thing
in todays spoken language. "Modifying" is perhaps a more polite and
politically correct form. Hacking implies that you don't really know what you
are attempting to do.
The two different types of changes made to the servos are for different end
results. Probably for your (and most BEAM applications) walker, you should
remove the internal circuit board, or disconnect it from the motor, and
solder two wires directly to the terminals on the motor and bring them
outside of the servo case and attach them to your BEAM circuit. (and cut off
the limiting stops so the gears can rotate in a complete circle)
- If you read my last post again you will find your answer. If the control
board stays connected to the servo then you have to give it a pulse train
input in order to get the servo to move. Like I said this is more common
with Stamp type microcontrollers where you can easily develope that kind
If you want to use the servo like a motor e.g. apply voltage and watch it
go. Then you have to remove the control board and hook your own leads to
the motor. This is the most common way to do it for beam walker
applications because essentially you have a geared dc motor.
When they say that hacking and modifying mean the same thing it means that
people use either word to describe what they are doing. When you hack
something you change its original form into something that is useful to
you. Modifying has the same general definition. You use the word hacking
when you talk about things to your friends (I hacked these servos into a
robot motor) and you use the word modify when you want your parents to buy
you some servos (I need these servos so I can modify them into robot
--- lync_17 <lync_17@...> wrote:
> hi guys__________________________________________________
> thankx for messaging me out. i mean luther you gave a very nice
> description of what i required and chuck, pat and eric thankx for the
> site info , but i already have seen it. if you have seen my previous
> messages you may have notices what kind of motors i might have tired
> using at various times.the help iven bby you was very good.
> but one important aspect which you people forgot is:
> if you have seen the tutorials on both the sites i hade mentioned
> in my prev. mess. one of them removes the whole of the control
> circuitry while the other just makes a change of resistance from
> variable to fixed.so chuck&pat how can you say that both hacking
> and modifying meant the same? i mean to cut off the tag to make it
> move a complete rotation is same in both but then when you see the
> other change then it seems to make a difference.
> so which do you think is a better option , i mean from what luther
> has to say since the servo feels its at a centering poisition , i
> felt that would be a btter option, but in the tutorial i m using to
> build my bot, the guy has modified the servo.and i plan to use a
> hobby standard servo.so what do ya say guys?
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball