Re: [bbshop] A request for opinions:)
- At 12:40 AM 11/3/2002 -0500, Erik Deland wrote:
>Bear,I like them too, but as one who has worked from spots only for years, I
>Nice idea about learning tapes. Personally, I like
>In my case, I can read music pretty well, but at the
>same time, even though I am aware of the note I'm
>singing, sometimes I need some kind of re-enforcement
>just to assure myself that I'm bang on a note,...
find that the use of both is the ideal. (Of course, learning tapes are
better when driving :-) ) As a retired teacher, I think that total
reliance on either would neglect some members because of their learning
styles. Some of us rely more heavily on what we see, others on what we hear.
Bass - Upper Canada Chordsmen, Suburbanaires,
- I make a lot of computer generated MIDI files which are a lot easier
and cheaper to make than sung learning- tapes. These are quite
helpful for learning just the notes and timing exactly the way the
notes are written without interpretation and without lyrics. Most
programs will allow making part predominent and part missing files and
they can be made to play either at normal speed or slower if
desirable. People with computers can play them directly or make their
own tapes if they want to use them elsewhere. They can be easily
distributed as email attachments.
Sung tapes have the advantage of also giving the desired pronunciation
of words and interpretation. The pronunciation is especially helpful
where English is not universally spoken. The problem with
"interpreted" tapes is that they are often counter-productive in that
the interpretation on the tape is entirely different from what the
director of the using chorus wants. Now if the director makes
interpreted tapes for his/her chorus, that should be a big help. I
have often wondered if Chris Arnold makes just-tuned interpreted tapes
for his chorus. Could be one good reason that TNL is so terrific.
I use MusicPrinter Plus to make MIDI files and it takes me about five
minutes per system, unformatted for printing and without lyrics. This
creates a file in MPP format which can be played or printed in the
program. This file can be played on the computer system-column at a
time. Thus, one can play the song one chord at a time or one note if
there is only one note instead of a chord in a column. Or one can
set the tempo and let the computer play it. It's easy to stop at any
problem spot and repeat that system as many times as desired and one
can look at the score as it is being played. This is especially
helpful for songs with tricky rhythms. Therefore, when I receive a
sung learning tape with an arrangement, I generally made an MPP file
for my own use.
Once the MPP file is made, MIDI files can be made from it in only a
few minutes. Unfortunately, MPP is an obsolescent DOS based program.
This is why I am sticking with Windows 98 since, apparently, MPP will
not run correctly in the DOS window of later versions of Windows. If
anyone knows different, please let me know.
Frank Thorne Chapter S.P.E.B.S.Q.S.A
BABS Associate Member
The EUCOM Harmonizers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Deland" <erikdeland@...>
To: "Bear in Oz" <bearinoz@...>; "Harmonet"
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [bbshop] A request for opinions:)
> Nice idea about learning tapes. Personally, I like
> In my case, I can read music pretty well, but at the
> same time, even though I am aware of the note I'm
> singing, sometimes I need some kind of re-enforcement
> just to assure myself that I'm bang on a note, as
> opposed to being too sharp or too flat. Section
> leaders and directors are great resources, but still,
> I like to have a learning tape of some sort to confirm
> the note or notes and save them in my head when I get
> home. My chorus uses the learning tapes that Chris
> Arnold (of TNL) makes, and they're awesome! Chris
> makes it all seem easy, and if you've ever used any of
> his learning tapes, you know what I'm talking about!
> Learning tapes should not be used as an interpretive
> plan of a song. They should be used for learning, as
> opposed to taking up chorus time learning notes and
> words. Chorus time should be for interpretive planning
> and singing through songs as opposed to learning music
> on the spot. I think learning tapes are very
> beneficial. I use it to confirm the tough notes, and
> re-enforce the remainder. I don't think I'd be as
> confident a singer without my learning tapes.
> Erik Deland
> Baritone - Oakville Entertainers
> Tenor - The Young And The Rest of Us
> Ontario District
> AHSOW - Class of '01
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
- At 12:21 AM 11/3/2002, Bear wrote:
>With the advent of learning tapes, I can see the possibility of Music-lessHey Bear,
>Choruses. Yep, no sheet music ever. What do ya think?
We have solved the problem. We create learning tapes with a program called
Melody Assistant/Virtual Singer which creates simulated voices. It does
allow you to use your own interpretation. However, the "American English"
is so stilted that nobody in their right mind would attempt to sing exactly
the way it is sung on tape. However, the program does enable you to learn
the notes, the words, the tempos, including rubato. It does emphasize some
vocal production issues such as holding out the vowel until the end of the
measure before adding the terminal consonant. You have to be sure to put in
breaths or the simulation will have absolutely no breaths at all except for
rests. You can try the shareware program @ <www.myriad-online.com>.
| | |
| John Witmer <witmer@...> | Barbershop Bass |
| 111 Rainbow's End | The Upstate Four |
| Anderson, SC 29626 | Music Vice President |
| Phone (864)375-1510 | Spartanburg Chorus |