Re: [bbshop] Quartet Procedure Question
That is a good one!
My feeling on this is if the quartet paid for the uniforms and they can be used by the new member of the quartet, The member leaving the quartet should in
fact be willing to let the uniforms go so the quartet can move on.
I have been through this many times and still do have uniforms that the quartet paid for but there were other vests and accessories that I let go so the replacement
could use them and move on.
There was one vest that was passed on to us by another quartet where the vests were hand made sequin vests and could not be replaced and I know for a fact that
there were about 6 personnel changes and the vests were always passed on to the newer member.
Now the quartet is gone but I still have that vest in my closet.
The difference here is that I was a UNIQUE size and the uniforms would not fit anyone else so it wasn’t an issue, If the uniforms fit the new member and you are
pressed for time due to upcoming gigs than I think the exiting member is wrong in not allowing this to happen!
Good Luck resolving this issue!
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 3:33 PM
Subject: [bbshop] Quartet Procedure Question
Recently a member of my Quartet quit without any notice. Leaving us to fill 7 gigs in 9 days. Just a little bit unprofessional. But I digress. My question - the Quartet paid for all of our outfits and we would like all of the outfits back so that we can use them with our next member (they just happen to be the same size). The problem.....the former member wants us to buy the items back from him.
Are there any standard practises that address this issue?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Dave, I don't have a set of rules in front of me, but I am sure that to cross the stage as a performer, you must be a member or Associate member (Director)...
AND, keep in mind as a Board Member now, you have fiduciary responsibilities. If we have non-dues-paying members with no tickets purchased, how do you account for their incurred expenses, and their lack of contribution toward profits?
It would be great if the entire Barbershop experience were free and had no restrictions, but that lotter ticket has yet been won.
All the reasons for "eval only" are right on the money, but we must use our judges to evaluate members, otherwise, we are not being fair to our members.
Anything I win above $200 million will go toward making Barbershop a much less expensive thing...
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Dave Jacobs <g8r10r@...> wrote:
> Exactly, Neil. A chorus with non-members on stage would be disqualified
> from "the contest". But, it shouldn't preclude them from singing on-stage
> for evaluation only, which, by definition, is not scored as part of the
> contest. (C&J community, feel free to chime in if I'm wrong here.)
> Each singer would probably need to purchase a convention registration, but
> that could probably be waived since they are not "competing". (I can't
> remember of the top of my head if the convention registration requirement
> is a C&J requirement, or a Society rule to exempt the contest from ASCAP
> Hey, imagine having a Youth Harmony Festival just before your next district
> convention, then inviting the Boys Chorus to mic test for the chorus
> contest. Heck have the girls chorus sing, too. What would you risk -
> extra single event ticket sales to family members? ...just brainstorming,
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Neil Keihm <keihm@...> wrote:
> > Dave,
> > If you are not a member, you are not eligible to enter the contest.
> > Neil
> Dave Jacobs
> Musical Director - Barbergator Chorus
> Sunshine District - VP of Chorus Director Development
> Advancement Coordinator - BSA Troop 454
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]